Search for: "Edwards v. Owens" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 7:25 pm by landuseprof
The abstract: In February, 2012, in a case called Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:45 am by propertyprof
Here's the abstract: In February, 2012, in a case called Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:34 am
Case: Liversidge v Owen Mumford Ltd and Abbott Laboratories Ltd [2012] EWPCC 33, 26 July 2012. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 6:04 pm
Smith/Bryan Cave Lecture & Symposium, entitled, Enforcing Constitutional Rights in the 21st Century: Section 1983 Thirty Years After Owen v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Here's the TOC:Ex AnteMistakes • Bad Paterno • Justice Precedent • York v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
Commissioner Rowland’s formula, adopted by Mr Perdios, was wrong.Many thanks to Sean Pettit of 1 Pump Court and Tony Owen of TV Edwards for the report. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
Commissioner Rowland’s formula, adopted by Mr Perdios, was wrong.Many thanks to Sean Pettit of 1 Pump Court and Tony Owen of TV Edwards for the report. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Redpath, and Owen Mark Williams Case number: 10-cv-03995 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case filed: September 21, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 15, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-40 SEC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 8:20 am
The seventh edition of Clark's Publishing Agreements: A Book of Precedents has now been published by Tottel under the guidance of general editor Lynette Owen. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
It was one week ago today that the Court issued its decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
Whilst it is not hard to see why both sides asked the Court to proceed on this assumption, it seems that this is not necessarily a correct assumption and indeed before the referendum, two senior figures (Sir David Edward – a former CJEU judge and Professor Derrick Wyatt QC – a leading constitutional lawyer at the University of Oxford) opined that this was not so and that it was possible for the UK to pull out of pulling out, so to speak. [read post]