Search for: "Edwards v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 2:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
DOJ: “The United States today filed a lawsuit against Edward Snowden, a former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), who published a book entitled Permanent Record in violation of the non-disclosure agreements he signed with both CIA and NSA. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:15 am
Healy, 26 M.J. 394 (C.M.A. 1988), and United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
The'281 patent was filed on January 5, 2009 and descends from a number of United States, international, and French patent applications. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
The decision of the Indiana Supreme Court from last May in Edwards v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:55 am by Mali Friedman
By Mali Friedman and Simon Frankel With all eyes on the Affordable Care Act today, the United States Supreme Court also quietly dismissed a case that could have had a profound impact on a wide range of citizens’ rights litigation—First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 3:05 am by Paul Caron
United States, 107 A.F.T.R.2d 311 (IA D.C. 2010)) TaxProf blog coverage here and here.] [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:48 am by Laura C. Nagi
”  While Edwards' appeal was pending, the Third Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:22 am by Robert Vrana
The two companies are each other’s only competitors in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:22 am
The United States disagreed, and the Ninth Circuit agreed with the United States. [read post]