Search for: "Ehrman v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2008, 11:45 pm
Three Heller Ehrman employees have decided to sue the firm. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
(…) In the meantime, Heller filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:30 pm
In Washington state Heller Ehrman wrote an amicus brief on behalf of a group of historians in the same-sex marriage case, Andersen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 8:01 am by Dan Bressler
Starting with: “Looking at Your Firm’s Balance Sheet: Law Firm Clients, and Lawyers, are Not Property” — “It has been almost two years since the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Heller Ehrman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Ehrman and Craig cautioned that this decision signals the Court’s potential willingness to overturn Chevron deference and noted that it may do so in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
(Nov. 8, 1910); see Simmons, California Tax Collection: Time for Reform (2008) 48 Santa Clara L.Rev. 279, 285-286; Ehrman & Flavin, Taxing Cal. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
" On March 20, the Supreme Court issued the decision in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 4:50 pm
On Tuesday, January 16, the Court will hear argument in No. 05-1429, Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
In those emails from the “Frank Cross” email address, defendant attached links to his anonymous blog entries containing Ehrman’s emails, and stated that “Bart” had “put his foot in his mouth again. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Ehrman, Southern Methodist University School of Law, and Robin Kundis Craig, USC Gould School of Law EPA’s regulatory authority is limited by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “waters of the United States. [read post]