Search for: "Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, when it held that a plaintiff must establish loss causation to invoke the fraud-on-the-market presumption. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:39 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Carlisle & Jacquelin against inquiring into the merits at the class certification stage.  [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974), and General Telephone Co. of the Southwest v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:21 am
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974) for the proposition that the court is precluded from a preliminary merits inquiry on class certification. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 177 (1974): "We find nothing in either the language or history of Rule 23 that gives a court any authority to conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits of a suit in order to determine whether it may be maintained as a class action." [read post]
17 May 2013, 12:29 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 572 (2d Cir.1968) (Judge Lumbard, dissenting from remand)). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:36 am by Andrew Trask
Carlisle & Jacqueline to blockade against either (1) inconvenient facts or (2) costly, time-consuming dives into certification-related issues. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:11 am
  Complicating the issue is the statement by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Eisen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:15 am
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 176 n.13 (1974), and to class members who filed separate suits after class certification was denied, see Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 179 (1974)). [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]