Search for: "Eisner v. Macomber"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 3:00 am
The case was Eisner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:07 pm
This provision moves beyond the Wyden mark-to-market tax, making it somewhat more of a prepayment provision for future tax liabilities that might be more conventionally realized.In the question period, I opined that the 6 right-wingers on the Supreme Court would probably strike it down, relying on Eisner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:10 am
The legal academy predominantly agrees that this doctrine from the Macomber case is both obsolete (dating back at least to Helvering v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:57 am
It is true, however, that Eisner v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
A famous old Supreme Court case, Eisner v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:20 am
Seligman, the question that would interest me starting out is why on earth did he write that crazy American Economic Review piece / amicus brief in Eisner v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
"); see Eisner v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:15 am
New York Times: How the Courts Constrain Tax Reform, by Bruce Bartlett: The taxation of capital gains has always been among the most politically contentious elements of the tax code and will be among the most difficult to resolve when fundamental tax reform is undertaken. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 am
“We are brought irresistibly to the conclusion,” said the majority in Eisner v. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:44 am
Macomber), and further includes all "accessions to wealth" (Commissioner v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Macomber, 252 U.S. 189, 207 (1920). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
BuchananEach time I teach the basic Federal Income Taxation course, I have the mixed pleasure of teaching the famous case of Eisner v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:02 am
There is of course whatever remains, as constitutional law, of Eisner v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am
by Neil H. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
He was wrong that that case should stand in the way of Congress, but he was wrong in a way that is both understandable and that might point to a way for motivated Supreme Court conservatives to block Congress’s possible future policy choice.In 1920, the Supreme Court held 5-4 in favor of the taxpayer in the now-infamous Eisner v. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Especially useful are the arguments from some conservatives who revealed that they are prepared to revive and abuse Eisner v. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Especially useful are the arguments from some conservatives who revealed that they are prepared to revive and abuse Eisner v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:59 am
" The court also cited the Supreme Court's holding in Eisner v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It sometimes seems that every policy disagreement is immediately turned into a constitutional question. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It sometimes seems that every policy disagreement is immediately turned into a constitutional question. [read post]
