Search for: "Electrical Workers v. Labor Board" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2017, 1:16 pm by Aurora Barnes
National Labor Relations Board 16-1370 Issues: (1) Whether, under NLRB v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
On this framework, in 2006, in the Labor Board held that a private project labor agreement between the Glen Falls Building & Construction Trades Council and a private developer of a co-generation electric power plant violated Section 8(e).Glens Falls Bldg. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
On this framework, in 2006, in the Labor Board held that a private project labor agreement between the Glen Falls Building & Construction Trades Council and a private developer of a co-generation electric power plant violated Section 8(e).Glens Falls Bldg. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:04 am by LRToday
Chairwoman Liebman, Member Schaumber and Member Pearce issued a unanimous Decision and Determination of Dispute in the matter of Electrical Workers Local 71 (Capital Electric Line Builders, Inc.), 355 NLRB No. 24 (April 16, 2010).  [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:35 pm by Sme
Estate of Morris Blackburn (10th Cir., May 23, 2017) (affirming Black Lung Benefits compensation claim and denying petition for review: the Labor Benefits Review Board did not err in affirming the award below)*Hays v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
Decisions of interest concerning Labor and Employment Law Source: Justia October 28, 2011 Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:10 am by Pat Muldowney
Electrical Workers Local 1229 (Jefferson Standard), 346 U.S. 464 (1953), and Linn v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:30 am by Pat Muldowney
Electrical Workers Local 1229 (Jefferson Standard), 346 U.S. 464 (1953), and Linn v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Electrical Workers Local 1229 (Jefferson Standard), 346 US 464 (1953). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:20 am
The court held that the third prong in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]