Search for: "Electronic Industries Association v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm by Mary
The United States has a long tradition of protection for reader privacy. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
.); and (v) Art & Science – the many ways of epistemic insights.He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways in teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm by Michael Froomkin
On the contrary, electronic technology is conducive to freedom. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) to register the APP STORE mark in the United States, and the USPTO eventually approved Apple’s application to register the APP STORE as a trademark. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm by Marie Louise
’ Convergence facts, figures and trends (IPKat) 100 domains on movie and music industry website blocking wishlist (TorrentFreak) Design infringement in the UK: official guidance (Class 99) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC rejects narrow view of analogous arts test: Innovention Toys vs. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:07 am by Susan Brenner
On October 17, at Hoffman's request, Wu traveled from China to the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:07 pm by FDABlog HPM
  However, the sources of information listed in the regulation has expanded to include “any clinical or epidemiological investigations, animal or in vitro studies, reports in the scientific literature, and unpublished scientific papers, as well as reports from foreign regulatory authorities and reports of foreign commercial marketing experience for drugs that are not marketed in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Phone-hacking Steve Coogan and Andy Gray (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US Patent Reform Tech industry unhappy with US Patent Reform Bill (IP Watch) US Patents The US could end up hurting its own companies as a result of the Huawei 3Leaf decision (IAM) Computer software patents in the US (Tangible IP) From Marconi to Microsoft: The rise and fall of the ‘25 percent rule’ for determining damages from patent infringement (ipeg) Paul Allen’s NPE is the… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
  A successful prosecution with the narrower continuation in the United States could then be used in the PPH. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
Agard, Debtor, Chapter 7 The Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of New York The Judge: The Honorable Robert E. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
CPOs must submit annual reports to NFA electronically in accordance with NFA’s EasyFile electronic filing system ( and procedures. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
 This issue includes a special dedication to the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Paul R. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm by Paralegal Mentor
The court’s opinion cited cases in the United States Supreme Court in which NALA filed an amicus brief, Missouri v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am by Kara OBrien
UK branches of firms whose home state is within the EEA are not required to apply the Code as their home state will be required to apply equivalent provisions under CRD3. [read post]