Search for: "Elkins v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-1059, which presents what may be the most specific criminal-law question in the history of the world. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:50 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-778 Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
That fee is set by a schedule based on the floor area of the units built. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law At Take Care, Samuel Bagenstos argues that in Husted v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-270 Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Vinson & Elkins’ Lincoln’s Law Blog, John Elwood and Ralph Mayrell note a recent cert denial in a False Claims Act case. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming, noting that at “issue is not just Lee’s fate, but also the Court’s view of the state of plea bargaining in this country. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by John Elwood
Ohio 16-5580 Issue: (1) Whether the first attempt to execute the petitioner was cruel and unusual under the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution and if so, whether the appropriate remedy is to bar any further execution attempt on the petitioner; (2) whether a second attempt to execute the petitioner will be a cruel and unusual punishment and a denial of due process in violation of the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States… [read post]