Search for: "Elkins v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2016, 10:20 am by Andrew Hamm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
” [Disclaimer: Lawyers at Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this feature, represent one industry respondent in these cases.] [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
” (Stanley Elkins & Eric McKitrick, THE AGE OF FEDERALISM, at p. 703). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am by Kevin
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
“The fact there have been 17 permits approved shows states are really figuring out how to do this,” Margaret Peloso, an attorney at Vinson & Elkins LLP who works on permits for industry clients, told BNA.Permits Target EfficienciesPSD requires new and modified sources to obtain permits for emissions of regulated air pollutants and to control those emissions using best available control technology (BACT), determined individually for each sourcePermitting includes a… [read post]