Search for: "Elkins v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am by Rory Little
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an insider trading case. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 10:20 am by Andrew Hamm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by scottgaille
Upon his criminal conviction, the United States expected to seize whatever was left of his wealth. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
” [Disclaimer: Lawyers at Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this feature, represent one industry respondent in these cases.] [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
” (Stanley Elkins & Eric McKitrick, THE AGE OF FEDERALISM, at p. 703). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]