Search for: "Elkins v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
United States, 17-9560, involves a defendant who came to the U.S. from the United Arab Emirates on a student visa. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Similarly, Justice William Johnson adhered to a “federalism of the tripartite contract” in the South Carolina federal circuit case, Elkins v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Jonathan Chausovsky The vast uprising of critiques of the current effort to dismantle the institutions of the United States Government is pervasive and important. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
In a world of grey, the conflict couldn’t be more black and white—the kind of old-school, imperialist belligerence that the United Nations was devised to thwart. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
” [Disclaimer: Lawyers at Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this feature, represent one industry respondent in these cases.] [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Bremerton School District, 18-12 Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
.
Vinson & Elkins Dismissed From Enron Shareholders' Suit
Texas Lawyer
Houston's Vinson & Elkins, longtime outside counsel for Enron Corp., has been dismissed from a massive shareholder securities class action. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 16-309). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 4:45 am
” Friday prayers and maximum-security prisons Ali v Secretary of State for Justice [2024] EWHC 2829 (KB) was an appeal against the dismissal of Mr Ali’s claim in the County Court in Central London. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
[United States] : [Distributed by] PBS, c2010. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
Elkins, Jr. issued a press statement dated September 28, on the report. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
