Search for: "Elliott v. Elliott" Results 1 - 20 of 747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
She cites ElliottEstate v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
. — Treaty of Point Elliott (1855), Article 5This is our country. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:23 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Elliott, chairman, et al. that challenged segregation and was one of the cases included in the Supreme Court case, Brown v Board of Education of Topeka, KS (1954). [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Mark Elliott, Public Law for Everyone: The Rwanda Bill and its constitutional implications. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm by Alexandra Shields
  Recent Federal Court jurisprudence The recent decision of Justice Lee in Elliott-Carde v McDonald’s Australia Limited (Stay Application) [2023] FCA 1210 (McDonald’s) and his Honour’s comments in Transport Workers Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited (NSD1309/2020) have clarified that proceedings under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act) do not preclude class action proceedings under Part IVA of the Federal Court of… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
It also aligns with the Legislature's recent amendment of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq., to explicitly prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
Robert Elliott, a formerly enslaved person, debating Rep. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
It proposes a "spirit of the Constitution" approach based on McCullough v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Howard Wasserman
The descendants of the plaintiffs in Briggs v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
Elliott for historical correctness, but the issue is a bit complex and the court likely had several reasons for putting the Kansas case first. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]