Search for: "Elliott v. Elliott" Results 261 - 280 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 5:07 pm by Colin O'Keefe
In one of the biggest stories of the day, we have great insight on the Thompson v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:00 pm by Ritika Singh
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Mon, May 5 at 9:30 am: Oral arguments in Ralls Corporation v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:30 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Elliott, 923 S.W.2d 575, 577 (Tex. 1996) (attorney owes a duty of care only to his client, and privity rule requires this relationship as a predicate for legal malpractice claim); Gamboa v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
Second, although Lord Carnwath favoured effective supervision as the general rationale for a common law obligation to give reasons, the obligation could be justified in the present case (as in Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2017] 2 P & CR 4, [2017] EWCA Civ 71: see Mark Elliott’s post) on the basis that “openness and fairness to objectors required the members’ reasons to be stated” (at para 57, emphasis… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
That continues this week as they've been all over Christopher v. [read post]