Search for: "Elliott v. Elliott" Results 301 - 320 of 668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was… [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:56 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Supreme Court’s decision on an age discrimination case in 2009, when the Supreme Court ruled in Gross v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:20 am by Sarah Sutherland
Elliott, 2016 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) 5. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
These were the judgments after full trials Starr v Ward [2015] EWHC 1987 (QB) Paris & Garden v Lewis & Byng [2015] EWHC 0000 (QB) Ma v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1866 (QB) Ashgar v Ahmed [2015] EWHC 1118 (QB) Rai v Bholowasia [2015] EWHC B2 (QB) Mitchell v News Group Newspapers; Rowland v Mitchell [2014] EWHC 4015 (QB) Garcia v Associated Newspapers [2014] EWHC 3137 (QB) These were the libel… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:33 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
District Court for the Western District of Missouri (EEOC, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm by John Floyd
  The Lewis family attorney, Rex Elliott, vowed to “get justice. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:22 am by INFORRM
There were three libel judgments in the Court of Appeal: Murray v Associated Newspapers [2015] EWCA Civ 488 Cruddas v Calvert [2015] EWCA Civ 171 (see our Case Comment) Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121 There were no libel cases in the Supreme Court in 2015 but there was a “Reynolds” qualified privilege case in the Privy Council, Pinard-Byrne v Linton ([2015] UKPC 41). [read post]