Search for: "Ellis v. City Council"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 7:57 am
Ellis v Bristol City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 685 “The Code of Practice issued by the Health and Safety Commission was aimed to give guidance to the construction of health and safety regulations; a judge in construing the meaning of a regulation, should have regard to its meaning and purpose, any relevant judicial authority and also the Code of Practice when considering whether a place of work was unsafe for the employees working there. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:34 am
Whether place of work unsafe Ellis v Bristol City Council Court of Appeal “A judge should consider the Code of Practice issued by the Health and Safety Commission when deciding whether a place of work was unsafe. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:29 am
Birmingham City Council v (1) Shafi (2) Ellis [2008] EWCA Civ 1186 This is a complicated case, focusing much more on local government law than on housing law per se, but there are some significant implications for housing lawyers. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kowalski, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 700 (19 March 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Reynolds v Stone Rowe Brewer (a firm) [2008] EWHC 497 (QB) (18 March 2008) Geniki Investments International Ltd. v Ellis Stockbrokers Ltd [2008] EWHC 549 (QB) (19 March 2008) Al-Rawas v Pegasus Energy Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 617 (QB) (08 April 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Wells v Pilling Parish… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Ellis. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:51 am
Subsequent to the Project approvals’ successful journey through the City appeals process, HERO filed a writ petition against the City Council’s July 2016 final approval. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ibrahim & Ors, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 880 (23 April 2008) Clarke v R [2008] EWCA Crim 651 (23 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Campaign To End All Animal Experiments (t/a The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 417 (23 April 2008) Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ… [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:40 pm
Birmingham City Council v Bravington (2023) EWCA Civ 308 A quick one – A possession claim under s.84A Housing Act 1985 requires service of a notice under section 83ZA. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:51 am
HERO filed a writ petition against the City Council’s July 2016 final Project approval. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aziz v Aziz & Ors Rev 1 [2007] EWCA Civ 712 (11 July 2007) Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 688 (11 July 2007) Adelson & Anor v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [2007] EWCA Civ 701 (09 July 2007) MM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 687 (06 July 2007) Togher v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm
In Anderson v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 10:35 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
An area resident appealed the ZA’s decision to the Planning Commission, and then to the City Council, and after various interim steps in the City’s administrative proceedings (plaintiffs’ challenges to some of which are discussed in the opinion’s unpublished portion) the MND and project approval were upheld by the Council. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Matt Perault detailed the shifting partisan fault lines in speech policy after Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
In 1990 the Shidler firm merged with Preston, Thorgrimson, Ellis & Holman, which became Preston Gates & Ellis LLP, and then K&L Gates LLP. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
Ellis-Don Construction Ltd. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
People on a bus who were misbehaving as the bus passed through a council estate would, for example, not be caught by s.153A; bricks put through a window of an owner-occupied property would not be caught unless the perpetrator was a tenant; (c) this narrow definition made sense because, in any other factual situation, the council could (and should) seek an ASBO instead – see Birmingham City Council v Shafi and Ellis [2008] EWCA 1186 (our… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Opponent Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition (“Coalition”) appealed to the City Counsel, and the City Council up [read post]
