Search for: "Ellis v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
The subject is preemption – specifically the the United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
The “United States” were always referred to in the plural. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
"Cell phone users have an expectation of privacy in their cell phone location in real time and that society is prepared to recognize that expectation as reasonable," Judge Hamilton wrote, citing an important Supreme Court decision from 1967 known as United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:41 pm
Denying the government's motion to revoke Madoff's bail based on his alleged dissipation of assets while on release in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Ellis v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 10:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 9:43 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
The question presented was: In Ellis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:48 am
Rafael Carranza, Arizona Republic, Sept. 8, 2023 "The U.S. government has reached a class-action settlement to speed up the asylum process for nearly 20,000 Afghans evacuated to the United States two years ago and who have been waiting for months for their applications to be adjudicated. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm
Stephens, 574 U.S. 271, 276 (2015) (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:27 am
Ellis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
Perry and the Board of Pardons will enhance the reputation of Texas and the United States throughout the world. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
Under a proposed settlement agreement filed with the court Monday, April 21, giant truckload carrier Swift Transportation Company would pay $4.4 million to resolve class allegations that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act in its handling of criminal background checks for online applicants (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona, LLC, ED VA). [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:55 am
Not only does this decision invent a new jurisdictional requirement that does not exist in the statute, but it also contradicts how courts around the country - including the United States Supreme Court - have interpreted CAFA since its enactment. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:37 am
Facts: This case (Pennington v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:37 am
Facts: This case (Pennington v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 9:11 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
Problems in dual role were noted and avoided in United States v. [read post]
