Search for: "Elrod v. Burns"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
In Elrod v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:06 pm
Burns and Branti v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:48 pm
Applying Elrod v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:25 am
” Elrod v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:49 am
Burns (1976) and Branti v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
See Elrod v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
Newell, et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:48 am
Elrod v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Among the significant cases addressing this issue are Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347; Branti v Finkel, 445 US 507 and Rutan v Republican Party of Illinois, 497 US 62.* Although the decision does not address Miller’s probationary obligation, "probationary employees" in fact hold permanent appointments and may enjoy limited tenure rights. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:15 am
’ ” (quoting Elrod v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 6:47 pm
” Elrod v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:30 pm
” Elrod v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:55 am
In Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, the U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Frye Issue: Whether the Court’s decision on political firings in Elrod v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:26 am
” The panel relied upon the plurality decision in Elrod v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:35 pm
Elrod v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
" The Supreme Court so recognized in Elrod v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:02 am
According to Walsh, this violated the first amendment, as applied to political patronage in Elrod v. [read post]
