Search for: "Emery v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Burchfield of the Washington law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, with ten minutes. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Guest Blogger
It does not aim at marriage, but, rather, at preventing early parenthood and investing in young people’s education and human capital.Sawhill proposes to “change the default” to reduce the staggeringly high percentage of unplanned and unwanted births in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm by June Casey
For example, the vast majority of lawsuits in the United States are based on contract claims, the median value of lawsuits is on a downward trend, and, on a per capita basis, many fewer lawsuits are filed today than were filed in the 19th century. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
The United States Supreme Court held that a single violation of Brady obligations is not sufficient to create civil damages liabilities for a district attorney’s office under section 1983. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
[edited to add link to case] In a 3-2 en banc  ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In case you're wondering why this topic has been chosen, it has been quite controversial in the United States and, in a recent judgment in Och-Ziff, Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was actually part of both EU and United Kingdom trade mark law.  22 good souls have signed up for it already. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Laufer (The Wharton School), on Saturday, November 28, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide Legal Times The case of Bowles v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Splenda case, or, as it's officially known, Merisant Co. v. [read post]