Search for: "Emery v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Guest Blogger
It does not aim at marriage, but, rather, at preventing early parenthood and investing in young people’s education and human capital.Sawhill proposes to “change the default” to reduce the staggeringly high percentage of unplanned and unwanted births in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Burchfield of the Washington law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, with ten minutes. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am by Schachtman
Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd., [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 3 All E.R. 385 (holding that copying does not invalidate a court’s decision); id. at para. 41 (citing United States v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 4:39 am by Heidi Henson
” According to the lawsuits, the defendants trafficked over 500 Indian guestworkers to the United States after Hurricane Katrina and forced them to work for Signal under barbaric conditions. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 447 U.S. 649, 656–657, 100 S.Ct. 2395, 2401–2402, 65 L.Ed.2d 410; United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm by Antonin I. Pribetic
The Plaintiffs sued the Defendants in  the United States for damages for the wrongful death of the late Ms. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
 The Washington Post quotes the investigation as stating that “Huawei and ZTE have failed to assuage the committee’s significant security concerns presented by their continued expansion into the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm by Larry
United States, 607 F.3d 771, 773 (Fed. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court didn’t resolve the issue, because other issues were fatal.In Emery v. [read post]