Search for: "Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 21 - 40
of 18,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2018, 11:04 am
Vicarious Liability As a general rule, an employer is responsible for the negligent acts of an employee, if the act is during and within the scope of employment. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
The post Employment Practices Liability Insurance—Is It Worth It? [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:14 am
The post Employer Liability in Maryland Auto Accidents appeared first on Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:54 am
Respondeat Superior Respondeat Superior refers to the vicarious liability of employers. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:03 pm
Tyrrell [SCOTUSblog materials] that the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) does not apply to out-of-state corporations. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:22 am
Occasionally, an employer will be sued by a third party (customer, client, member of public) for liability allegedly caused by one of the employer’s employees. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Prior to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court case noted above, most commercial general liability carriers took the position that the employer's liability exclusions in the commercial general liability policy supported a denial of liability coverage not only to the store that obtained the policy but also to Company A--the owner.Here, in the Mutual Benefit Ins. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 2:30 pm
The post Court Discusses Employer Liability in Employee Car Accident Case appeared first on Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:43 pm
The post Employer-Friendly Ruling in Sexual Harassment and Franchisor Liability Case appeared first on HRWatchdog by HRWatchdog. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
In some cases, an employer may be liable even where the employee is personally immune from suit. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:32 pm
"Employers' Liability insurance is a legal requirement for all employers in Great Britain," Robbins commented. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 11:04 am
Vicarious Liability As a general rule, an employer is responsible for the negligent acts of an employee, if the act is during and within the scope of employment. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:45 am
The result is that employers’ liability policies which are written on a ‘sustained’ or ‘contracted’ basis will, in mesothelioma cases, respond by reference to the date of exposure rather than the date of the tumour. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:33 am
The post Cases to Watch Update: Liability for Payroll Records appeared first on HRWatchdog by Erika Frank. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:28 pm
If a driver was acting in the course and scope of employment or was operating an employer’s vehicle, the company could find itself facing claims of vicarious liability. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 4:29 am
Under Washington, D.C. law, an employer can be held liable for the legally careless actions of an employee in a medical malpractice case, even if the employer itself did not commit any legally careless actions. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 2:55 am
His motion was denied and the case was tried. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:55 am
Restitution Order in Criminal Case, Oct. 4, 2017, Hammond Wrongful Death Lawyer Blog The post Indiana Supreme Court Rules on Employer Liability for Employee Negligence appeared first on Indiana Injury And Family Lawyer Blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
Vicarious liability for unlawful harassment is a huge problem for employers. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 10:42 am
The case law upon which the supreme court based its reasoning was decided in 1974. [read post]
