Search for: "England v. Medical Examiners" Results 21 - 40 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
 Never too late 30 [week ending Sunday 25 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case T‑11/14 Grundig Multimedia AG… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Omalu, no stranger to lost causes, was the medical examiner of San Joaquin County, California, at the time of his engagement in the Pritchard case. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Although Canada initially inherited the reasonable person standard from England in Vaughn v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
.* Life as a patent examiner according to the EPO - paid-for article in the New ScientistThe EPO has paid for an article promoting the career path of an EPO Examiner on the New Scientist. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
In the case of prospective employees, a firm might promise them that they will not be sexually molested by the doctors the firm uses to conduct medical examinations as part as the job-interview process. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:09 am by Matrix Law
The correct test to decide what is a reasonable alternative treatment is what can be referred to as the ‘professional practice test’ which is set out in Bolam in England and Wales and Hunter in Scotland. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:35 pm
The now-defunct Exchequer Court examined the issue back in 1964, in Canada (Minister of National Revenue – M.N.R.) v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
* Endoscope and remedial scope: inside view of an application for summary judgment Medical Innovations Ltd v Eakins and others is a Chancery Division, England and Wales decision delivered by Richard Meade QC. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
 Never too late 30 [week ending Sunday 25 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case T‑11/14 Grundig Multimedia AG… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The death of James Brady, President Ronald Reagan’s press secretary, at age 73 earlier this week has been ruled a homicide by a medical examiner. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:00 am by Tim Titolo
  Today we will examine the constitutionality of Health Care Reform and the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm by Katie Cohen
But experts say that the Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
The company claims that the awards will be "a true reflection of what fans are listening" to.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes looked back at a busy year for the Enlarged Board of Appeal, examining, amongst others, some of the more controversial cases that 2019 brought, such as Pepper (G 3/19) and Computer simulated inventions (G 1/19).Rose also provided a breakdown of some of the important Board of Appeal cases of 2019, which included highlights such as a new… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:34 pm by Aparna Chandra
 An important piece of evidence in rape cases is the report of the medical examination of the rape victim. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
This post examines the Ahluwalia decisions and their implications going forward, including a discussion of myths and stereotypes about IPV that are both repudiated and reinforced in each decision. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
In England today, there could be no better example of the disconnect between authority and knowledge than the pronouncements of Crown Prince Charles on science and medicine[1]. [read post]