Search for: "England v. Medical Examiners" Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Indeed, Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2013] EWHC 3624 (Ch) is a 20 November decision of Mrs Justice Asplin in the Chancery Division (High Court, England and Wales) which would have been posted here ages ago if the IPKat had fewer interesting cases to write about and more time in which to write about them.Specialty -- the claimant in these proceedings -- specialised in the distribution and sale of pharmaceutical… [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
In AGA Medical Corporation v Occlutech (UK) Limited [2014] EWHC 2506 (Pat), Mr Justice Roth (Patents Court, England and Wales) addressed a number of issues like the ability of a confidential trial to destroy novelty and the effect of disclosing features not presented as ‘inventively distinct’. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm by Joe O'Neill
 The History of Expert WitnessesThe concept of an “expert witness” was first established in England by Lord Mansfield in the case of Folkes v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:47 pm by Vikram Raghavan
After examining the medical evidence, the trial judge concluded that Chauhan was not below sixteen years when he killed Das and his family. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 11:10 am by Schachtman
Interestingly, at three of the major clinical medical journals, the Journal of the American Medical Association, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Lancet, the NHST has prevailed over the almost four decades of observation. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
For decades, the courts allowed anything as long as the speaker was “an expert witness,” who uttered the magic words “reasonable medical certainty. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Google is to remove private medical records from search results after people request action. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  There were pieces in The Irish Examiner and the Sunday Times. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm
This post examines the conclusions reached in GJ and Others and the decision’s salience for India. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
There was also the Daily Telegraph’s sting on the then England football manager, Sam Allardyce. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]