Search for: "England v. Medical Examiners" Results 81 - 100 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Google will argue, as it did successfully in England in Metropolitan Schools v Google ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) (16 July 2009)), that its services as a search engine are passive in nature and therefore within the “mere conduit” definition. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The LSE Media Blog has an article that critically examines the risks involved in the UK government’s decision to privatise Channel 4. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Indeed, Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2013] EWHC 3624 (Ch) is a 20 November decision of Mrs Justice Asplin in the Chancery Division (High Court, England and Wales) which would have been posted here ages ago if the IPKat had fewer interesting cases to write about and more time in which to write about them.Specialty -- the claimant in these proceedings -- specialised in the distribution and sale of pharmaceutical… [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
In AGA Medical Corporation v Occlutech (UK) Limited [2014] EWHC 2506 (Pat), Mr Justice Roth (Patents Court, England and Wales) addressed a number of issues like the ability of a confidential trial to destroy novelty and the effect of disclosing features not presented as ‘inventively distinct’. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
This flows from the unique circumstances of the problematic positioning of this grave, the mistake flowing from that, together with the particular circumstances she has had regard to in the medical evidence. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: England and Wales High Court holds employee-inventor entitled to ‘fair share’ compensation: Kelly and Chui v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP Spotlight) (Out-Law) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (IPKat) (IAM) USPTO roundtable on deferred examination – reports and analysis (Inventive Step)… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:47 pm by Vikram Raghavan
After examining the medical evidence, the trial judge concluded that Chauhan was not below sixteen years when he killed Das and his family. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated (IPKat) England’s new shirt sponsors? [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 11:10 am by Schachtman
Interestingly, at three of the major clinical medical journals, the Journal of the American Medical Association, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Lancet, the NHST has prevailed over the almost four decades of observation. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
One interesting piece of libel news this week concerns the notorious case brought by US company, NMT Medical, against cardiologist Dr Peter Wilmshurst. [read post]