Search for: "Epps v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Legal scholar Garrett Epps and Slate commentator Mark Joseph Stern see Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Epps, Gilroy, and Fotouhi were issued 100 shares each. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm
Epps [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:25 pm
Epps, 2007 U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
Epps, 2009 U.S. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 pm
The Supreme Court Could Use the First Amendment to Unleash a Robocall Nightmare By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps looks at the recently argued case, Barr v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Corle v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
His presence most likely means that the Supreme Court will start exploring and perhaps expanding the scope of the Second Amendment.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
At ten a.m. today the Court will hear oral arguments in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 10:45 pm
Epps, 2007 U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am
”At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps takes a look at the justices’ order for additional briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:23 pm
S., at 165–168; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm
To apply United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
" New York's highest court, in Matter of Kelly v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am
S. 143, 147 (1972), what you were wearing, United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:40 am
” Briefly: In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses last week’s summary opinion in Tolan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps asserts that the Pennsylvania Republicans calling for Supreme Court intervention into a state court ruling, based on the state constitution, that invalidated the state’s congressional maps as a political gerrymander, are mounting a “partisan assault on the courts [at] the tip of a nationwide spear—Republican efforts to purge and remodel state courts to make sure they follow the party’s line. [read post]
