Search for: "Epstein v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The enforceability of non-competes in the United States is almost entirely a matter of state law, and in Connecticut, that largely means common law. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
Tomorrow, October 9th, the United States Supreme Court is hearing oral argument in one of the most important securities law cases in decades, Stoneridge Investment Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am by Paul Cassell
But somehow Epstein arranged a secret deal that avoided federal prosecution allowed him to serve most of his state term on "work release. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Epstein,  The History of Public Utility Rate Regulation in the United States Supreme Court: Of Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory RatesAngela R. [read post]
March 24, 2016) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has confirmed the significance of last year’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cheeks v. [read post]
March 24, 2016) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has confirmed the significance of last year’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cheeks v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:16 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
June 30, 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held they belong to the employer, who presumably can then either keep them or distribute them in whole or part to employees as it sees fit. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
He has filed his state-law intrusion-upon-seclusion claim against Paula, only (Count V). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:24 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:27 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:45 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
” Following is an excerpt: On December 15, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: On December 15, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm by David Lat
Professors Richard Epstein (left) and John Yoo * Are you still trying to make sense of the conflicting opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:20 pm
A decision issued yesterday by the United States Court of Appeals here in Atlanta shows how even good laws like the CVRA can sometimes lead to bad consequences. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From the Criminal Complaint in United States v. [read post]