Search for: "Epstein v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 1:09 pm by Epstein Becker Green
On December 9, 2014, a unanimous United States Supreme Court answered that question – no. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:06 pm by Epstein Becker Green
On December 9, 2014, a unanimous United States Supreme Court answered that question – no. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Will Baude
It begins: Last June, the headlines said that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 12:54 pm
United States and whether a treaty can increase the legislative power of Congress — is available here. [read post]
Employment issues to consider while awaiting decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) will imminently release its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and if the final ruling is consistent with the recently-leaked draft opinion (overturning Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey), employers may soon need to contend with a variety of novel… [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:16 am by Epstein Becker Green
June 30, 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held they belong to the employer, who presumably can then either keep them or distribute them in whole or part to employees as it sees fit. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:07 am by Epstein Becker Green
Jackson Women’s Health Organization one year ago overturned 50 years of legal precedent protecting the constitutional right to abortion in the United States, leaving the question of whether and how to regulate abortion to individual states. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, an important takings case decided by the Federal Circuit last year. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 10:56 am by Eugene Volokh
This position is also reflected in the majority of United States jurisdictions, as the Restatement (Second) of Torts indicates. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:27 am by Epstein Becker Green
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]