Search for: "Equitable Life Assurance Society of US v. Short" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2014, 5:04 am by Stephen Page
Reliance is a fact to be found; it is not to be imputed on the basis of evidence which falls short of proof of the fact. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
Since we covered most of the new relists in our earlier trek through Kansas, this will be short. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Pfizer Canada Inc., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 625 The patent system is based on a “bargain”, or quid pro quo:  the inventor is granted exclusive rights in a new and useful invention for a limited period in exchange for disclosure of the invention so that society can benefit from this knowledge. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  This seems to fly in the face the idea of presumption of innocent under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[17] Although the idea of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial seems to help an accused, this is not the same standard that a prosecutor has to use in deciding whether to charge someone – the standard is lower: “reasonable prospects for conviction. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  This seems to fly in the face the idea of presumption of innocent under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[17] Although the idea of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial seems to help an accused, this is not the same standard that a prosecutor has to use in deciding whether to charge someone – the standard is lower: “reasonable prospects for conviction. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm by The Legal Blog
According to the appellant Rule relating to agents cannot be used to by passing stipulations under the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 (in short the `Advocates Act'), more particularly under Sections 29, 31 and 32. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
Using more than one name is not nec ­essarily criminal. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
" As often occurs, Sophia assured Jane that she would never make claim to a beneficial ownership in the properties, except upon Jane's death. [read post]