Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 1 - 20 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2011, 1:45 am by constitutional lawblogger
, 40 Stetson Law Review 1 (2011), available on ssrn, Professor Eric Segall defines the judicial function as the resolution of "legal disputes by examining prior positive... [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 7:30 am by JB
On Wednesday, Eric Segall inaugurated his new video show and podcast, Supreme Myths, by interviewing me about originalism and living constitutionalism, constitutional design, and life tenure for the federal judiciary. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Eric Segall's (Georgia State) piece in the LA Times, arguing that CREW has standing to sue President Trump for an Emoluments Clause violation. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State) has posted "Reconceptualizing the Judicial Activism Debate as Judicial Responsibility: A Tale of Two Justice Kennedys," which will be published in the Arizona State Law Journal. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:11 pm by Howard Wasserman
Eric Segall has an excellent post at DorfonLaw about the proper role for law professors in controversial legal and political disputes. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm by Stephen Griffin
Amid the torrent of constitutional controversy, I want to make sure that Eric Segall’s interesting new book Originalism as Faith did not get lost. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am by Howard Wasserman
I have the new Courts Law essay, reviewing Eric Segall's Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which proposes codifying the current eight-Justice/even partisan divide on the Court. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:28 am by Howard Wasserman
As I was completing my prior post on the time passing for Eric Segall's eight-person partisan-divide Court, I thought of a way to save that plan and to put a check on infinite tit-for-tat Court expansion through mutual disarmament: Expand the Court to twelve with three Democratic appointees, then run the Segall plan with a 6-6 partisan divide. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
 Eric SegallThanks, Jack for engaging with these two questions. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:55 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eric Segall (Georgia State University College of Law) has posted The Internet as a Game Changer: Reevaluating the True Threats Doctrine (Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 183, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 6:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Eric Segall (Georgia State) and I on Segall's <i>Supreme Myths</i> Podcast appeared first on [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:14 am by Adam Steinman
Howard reviews Eric Segall’s article, Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which is forthcoming in the Pepperdine Law... [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
"Justices, Like Any Other Judges, Should Not Be Partisans: a Response to Eric Segall. [read post]
17 May 2020, 5:44 am by Adam Kolber
In case you missed it a couple of months ago, Eric Segall concisely skewered Supreme Court constitutional law jurisprudence, offering "10 representative examples that show how judge-made constitutional law is little more than the aggregate of the Justices' value preferences or, on some occasions, the results of bargaining among the Justices to reach a five-vote result that makes little sense. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 10:10 am
 In the meantime, readers may enjoy Eric Segall's review, in Northwestern's Colloquy, of Laurence Tribe's Invisible Constitution. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by JB
  Eric Segall interviews me on Supreme Myths5. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:47 am by Rick Hills
Tomorrow evening at 8 PM Eastern Time, I am joining four other profs (Neysoun Mahboubi, Eric Segall, Marin Levy, and Tom Ginsburg) and two journalists (Dahlia Lithwick and Emily Bazelon) to discuss Biden’s SCOTUS Commission on Clubhouse. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:18 pm by Howard Bashman
In today’s mail: I received a copy of law professor Eric J. [read post]