Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 1 - 20 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2011, 1:45 am by constitutional lawblogger
, 40 Stetson Law Review 1 (2011), available on ssrn, Professor Eric Segall defines the judicial function as the resolution of "legal disputes by examining prior positive... [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 7:30 am by JB
On Wednesday, Eric Segall inaugurated his new video show and podcast, Supreme Myths, by interviewing me about originalism and living constitutionalism, constitutional design, and life tenure for the federal judiciary. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Eric Segall's (Georgia State) piece in the LA Times, arguing that CREW has standing to sue President Trump for an Emoluments Clause violation. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State) has posted "Reconceptualizing the Judicial Activism Debate as Judicial Responsibility: A Tale of Two Justice Kennedys," which will be published in the Arizona State Law Journal. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:11 pm by Howard Wasserman
Eric Segall has an excellent post at DorfonLaw about the proper role for law professors in controversial legal and political disputes. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm by Stephen Griffin
Amid the torrent of constitutional controversy, I want to make sure that Eric Segall’s interesting new book Originalism as Faith did not get lost. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am by Howard Wasserman
I have the new Courts Law essay, reviewing Eric Segall's Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which proposes codifying the current eight-Justice/even partisan divide on the Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:55 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eric Segall (Georgia State University College of Law) has posted The Internet as a Game Changer: Reevaluating the True Threats Doctrine (Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 183, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:14 am by Adam Steinman
Howard reviews Eric Segall’s article, Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which is forthcoming in the Pepperdine Law... [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
"Justices, Like Any Other Judges, Should Not Be Partisans: a Response to Eric Segall. [read post]
17 May 2020, 5:44 am by Adam Kolber
In case you missed it a couple of months ago, Eric Segall concisely skewered Supreme Court constitutional law jurisprudence, offering "10 representative examples that show how judge-made constitutional law is little more than the aggregate of the Justices' value preferences or, on some occasions, the results of bargaining among the Justices to reach a five-vote result that makes little sense. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 10:10 am
 In the meantime, readers may enjoy Eric Segall's review, in Northwestern's Colloquy, of Laurence Tribe's Invisible Constitution. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
By Eric Segall There has been a lot of talk on various blogs about David Hyman's forthcoming article detailing how many law professors and others wrongly predicted how the Court would decide the commerce clause issue in the ACA case. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfYesterday my friend and co-blogger Prof Eric Segall provocatively suggested that the Supreme Court ought to overrule Roe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:18 pm by Howard Bashman
In today’s mail: I received a copy of law professor Eric J. [read post]