Search for: "Eric Segall"
Results 1 - 20
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2020, 7:30 am
On Wednesday, Eric Segall inaugurated his new video show and podcast, Supreme Myths, by interviewing me about originalism and living constitutionalism, constitutional design, and life tenure for the federal judiciary. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:45 am
, 40 Stetson Law Review 1 (2011), available on ssrn, Professor Eric Segall defines the judicial function as the resolution of "legal disputes by examining prior positive... [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm
Eric Segall's (Georgia State) piece in the LA Times, arguing that CREW has standing to sue President Trump for an Emoluments Clause violation. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 6:50 am
I had a lively conversation, about my new book, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed and more, with Eric Segall on his Supreme Myths podcast. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State) has posted "Reconceptualizing the Judicial Activism Debate as Judicial Responsibility: A Tale of Two Justice Kennedys," which will be published in the Arizona State Law Journal. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:11 pm
Eric Segall has an excellent post at DorfonLaw about the proper role for law professors in controversial legal and political disputes. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm
Amid the torrent of constitutional controversy, I want to make sure that Eric Segall’s interesting new book Originalism as Faith did not get lost. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am
I have the new Courts Law essay, reviewing Eric Segall's Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which proposes codifying the current eight-Justice/even partisan divide on the Court. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:50 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State University College of Law) has posted Is the Roberts Court Really a Court? [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:28 am
As I was completing my prior post on the time passing for Eric Segall's eight-person partisan-divide Court, I thought of a way to save that plan and to put a check on infinite tit-for-tat Court expansion through mutual disarmament: Expand the Court to twelve with three Democratic appointees, then run the Segall plan with a 6-6 partisan divide. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:53 pm
Eric Segall (Georgia State University College of Law) has posted The Internet as a Game Changer: Reevaluating the True Threats Doctrine (Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 183, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:55 pm
Eric Segall (Georgia State University College of Law) has posted The Internet as a Game Changer: Reevaluating the True Threats Doctrine (Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 183, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Eric SegallThanks, Jack for engaging with these two questions. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 6:56 pm
Eric Segall (Georgia State) and I on Segall's <i>Supreme Myths</i> Podcast appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:32 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted The Taxing Law of Taxpayer Standing (Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posed Lost in Space: Laurence Tribe's Invisible Constitution (Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, p. 434, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:14 am
Howard reviews Eric Segall’s article, Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which is forthcoming in the Pepperdine Law... [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:29 am
The post Ciara Torres-Spelliscy Speaks to Eric Segall Podcast About Her Upcoming Book, Corporatocracy appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
"Justices, Like Any Other Judges, Should Not Be Partisans: a Response to Eric Segall. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:32 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted Reconceptualizing the Judicial Activism Debate as Judicial Responsibility: A Tale of Two Justice Kennedys (Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 41, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
