Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 1 - 20 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2011, 1:45 am by constitutional lawblogger
, 40 Stetson Law Review 1 (2011), available on ssrn, Professor Eric Segall defines the judicial function as the resolution of "legal disputes by examining prior positive... [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Eric Segall's (Georgia State) piece in the LA Times, arguing that CREW has standing to sue President Trump for an Emoluments Clause violation. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State) has posted "Reconceptualizing the Judicial Activism Debate as Judicial Responsibility: A Tale of Two Justice Kennedys," which will be published in the Arizona State Law Journal. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:11 pm by Howard Wasserman
Eric Segall has an excellent post at DorfonLaw about the proper role for law professors in controversial legal and political disputes. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm by Stephen Griffin
Amid the torrent of constitutional controversy, I want to make sure that Eric Segall’s interesting new book Originalism as Faith did not get lost. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am by Howard Wasserman
I have the new Courts Law essay, reviewing Eric Segall's Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which proposes codifying the current eight-Justice/even partisan divide on the Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:55 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eric Segall (Georgia State University College of Law) has posted The Internet as a Game Changer: Reevaluating the True Threats Doctrine (Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 183, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:14 am by Adam Steinman
Howard reviews Eric Segall’s article, Eight Justices Are Enough: A Proposal to Improve the United States Supreme Court, which is forthcoming in the Pepperdine Law... [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
"Justices, Like Any Other Judges, Should Not Be Partisans: a Response to Eric Segall. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Glenn Reynolds
“Legal scholar Eric Segall argues originalism doesn’t qualify as a constitutional theory because originalists disagree on too many things. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 10:10 am
 In the meantime, readers may enjoy Eric Segall's review, in Northwestern's Colloquy, of Laurence Tribe's Invisible Constitution. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
By Eric Segall There has been a lot of talk on various blogs about David Hyman's forthcoming article detailing how many law professors and others wrongly predicted how the Court would decide the commerce clause issue in the ACA case. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:18 pm by Howard Bashman
In today’s mail: I received a copy of law professor Eric J. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:16 pm
"Faith, Wedding Cakes, and the Rule of Law": Eric Segall has this post at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:37 am by Howard Bashman
“A Supremely Dark Future”: Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]