Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 181 - 200 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2016, 4:41 am by Will Baude
In any event, we provoked a sur-reply, by Richard Posner and Eric Segall, called “Faux Originalism. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:17 am by Amy Howe
   And at ACSblog, Eric Segall applauded the denial of review, arguing that “[t]he course the Court adopted . . . increases the chances that when marriage equality for everyone finally arrives, it will be here to stay. [read post]
25 May 2009, 12:15 am
., Praeger Publishers, 2008).Eric Segall, Mired in the Marsh: Legislative Prayers, Moments of Silence, and the Establishment Clause, (Forthcoming, University of Miami Law Review, 2009).Zachary R. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by Austin Martin Williams
Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges, by Eric J Segall (Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law at GSU Law). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:12 am by Austin Williams
Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges, by Eric J Segall (Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law at GSU Law). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
News, while commentary comes from Garrett Epps for The Atlantic and Eric Segall at ACSblog.Additional coverage of Tuesday’s argument in Heffernan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
Segall and Hults respond to an essay we wrote that first appeared earlier this summer, not long after President Donald J. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am by Rachel Sachs
At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall considers the two cases the Court will hear this Term implicating concerns of racial equality, Fisher v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Daily Beast, Eric Segall maintains that in many Supreme Court constitutional law cases, the “Constitution, itself, is the starting point but rarely if ever dictates results,” because the framers “could not foresee nor help us answer today’s difficult constitutional questions. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:37 am by SHG
It happened on the twitters between Georgia State prawf Eric Segall and Alan Gura. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallProfessor Ilan Wurman of Arizona State has written a thoughtful and mostly fair review of my new book Originalism as Faith. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Segal, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, January 7, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation disclosure, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Compensation regulation, Director compensation, Dodd-Frank Act, Glass Lewis, ISS, Management, Proxy advisors, Say on frequency, Say on pay, Securities regulation, Taxation, Whistleblowers Sustainability Practices: 2016 Edition Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, Inc., on Sunday, January 8, 2017 Tags:… [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I think my friend and co-blogger Professor Eric Segall takes a view like this. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marissa Miller
At Slate, Eric Segall – a self-described “liberal constitutional law professor. . . and loyal Democrat” – argues that, “as a matter of both principle and law, Kagan should not hear the case.” [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:10 am
Segall, The Taxing Law of Taxpayer Standing, 43 Tulsa Law Review 673-696 (2008).John Witte, Jr. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
” In an essay for the Wake Forest Law Review, Eric Segall looks at the jurisprudence of Justice Antonin Scalia and argues that his “rejection of judicially created rights and limitations that do not have strong textual or historical support is a narrative that should not . . . hold up over time. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The Ethical Case for Neutral Third Party Investigators - Corporate investigator Philip Segal of Charles Griffin Intelligence on their blog, The Ethical Investigator If You Don’t Look for Water Contamination, You Won’t Find It. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
Segall at ACS Law, Carrie Severino at National Review, Timothy G. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Alfred Brophy
Sanders (University of Idaho College of Law); Eric J. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Conversation, Eric Segall takes issue with the tendency of “most court watchers” to deplore the current eight-member Supreme Court as “an incomplete, divided legal institution,” arguing that “the longer we have an evenly divided court, the more likely it will be the justices will act more modestly, and take more heed of Hamilton’s warning that they exercise ‘judgment’ not ‘will. [read post]