Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 181 - 200 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 11:42 am by Howard Bashman
“Judicial Review, the Supreme Court, and a Possible Constitutional Apocalypse”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:44 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court, Abortion, and Standing in an Incoherent Abyss”: Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Eric Segall offers thoughts on how law schools can push back against political polarization, generating further comments from Ilya Somin. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 7:25 pm
" Slate today has posted online the new installment of its "Amicus" podcast featuring Dahlia Lithwick, with guests Eric Segall and Adam Liptak. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by JB
ES: Jack, to the best of my knowledge, and maybe I'm wrong, you have never addressed the many historical sources collected by Sylvia Snowiss, Jack Rakove and others showing that the framers quite clearly had a conception of judicial review that was modest, humble, and centered around clear constitutional error (and the 14th did not change that according to the best historians of that time other than possibly for protecting the newly freed slaves). [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:21 am by Howard Wasserman
Eric Segall discusses everything wrong with the Court's 11th Amendment/sovereign immunity jurisprudence, discussing its evolution and incoherence. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Eric Segall reflects on the passing of the moment to instantiate his proposal for an evenly partisan eight-person Supreme Court, which died* with the arrival of Justice Gorsuch. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Some further thoughts on Eric Segall's proposal for an eight-person, even-partisan-divided Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Attorney General Eric Holder is coming to Boston next Tuesday to give a speech at a civil rights symposium. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:36 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Eric Segall, a self-described “liberal constitutional law professor” who believes the individual mandate is constitutional, argues in Slate that Justice Kagan should recuse herself in the individual mandate litigation. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:57 am by Ned Foley
Times expressing strong disagreement with the Baude-Paulsen view of Trump’s disqualification under section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment–and aligning himself with Michael McConnell’s and Eric Segals’s critiques of the Baude-Paulsen view: “My concern is that not… Continue reading The post “When the Law Is Not a Trump Card” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:05 pm by Howard Wasserman
I missed the introduction of this bill last week, which Eric Segall discusses. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:05 am by Howard Bashman
Segall has this post at the blog of the American Constitution Society. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:55 pm
" And today at "Dorf on Law," Eric Segall has a post titled "Text All The Way Down: Why the Government Should Prevail in King v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:17 am by Howard Bashman
“Expected Applications, the Second Amendment, and Why Real Originalism is Either Intolerable or Impossible”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law” responding to John O. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:40 am by Howard Bashman
“Section 3, Originalist Chaos, and Why Donald Trump Should Not Be Constitutionally Disqualified from the Presidency”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 9:29 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Mike Sacks is the host and the other guests are Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network and Georgia State University law professor Eric Segall. [read post]