Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 201 - 220 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2023, 9:00 am by Paul Caron
Eric Segall (Georgia State), Political Polarization, Legal Education, and a Few Modest but Serious Proposals: Twenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Wasserman
Or that both sides agree to end the arms race and adopt Eric Segall's plan to hold the Court at eight. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 2:32 pm by Howard Bashman
“10 Fascinating Facts About SCOTUS to Tide Us Over Until the Justices Wreck the Country in June”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Noted Supreme Court critic Eric Segall has been criticizing the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:29 pm by Ilya Somin
[Legal scholar and blogger Eric Segall puts forward several excellent suggestions.] [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm by Christopher J. Walker
Earlier this week I sat down with Eric Segall to participate in his Supreme Myths podcast. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:44 pm by Will Baude
(Jon Elswick/Associated Press) Eric Segall has a blog post titled: “To Fix the Confirmation Process We Need to Face the Truth About SCOTUS. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:50 am by NCC Staff
Eric Segall is the Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law at the Georgia State University School of Law. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:04 pm by Amy Howe
” At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall summarizes a recent panel on transparency at the Court, explaining that it focused primarily on “the lack of cameras at the Supreme Court but also the Justices’ anonymous votes on granting or denying certiorari, the Court’s recusal practices (or lack thereof), and the lack of rules concerning their taxpayer-funded papers. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:57 am by Howard Wasserman
Gerard and Eric Segall reflect on teaching Roe/Casey, perhaps for the final time, in the shadow of Dobbs and the prospective end of constitutional protection for abortion. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:06 pm by Orly Lobel
That's the title of the second panel in the upcoming conference on The Future of Legal Scholarship - and I, alongside Carissa Hessick and Eric Segall, am speaking on this panel. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:34 am by Paul Horwitz
One of her main interlocutors, Eric Segall, has his own post up now on the Dorf on Law blog.... [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:48 pm by Ian Bartrum
In early April, Pepperdine Law School is hosting a symposium focused on these issues, and, like Eric Segall and others, I have proposed a possible structural reform. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 8:50 pm by Orly Lobel
This should be an excellent conference, with keynote speaker Richard Posner and excellent participants including Mark Lemley, Darren Bush, Anthony Kreis, Eric Segall, Caprice Roberts, Spencer Waller, Nancy Leong, and prawfsblawgers me and Carissa Hessick. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:04 pm by Orly Lobel
Segall; Picking Spinach by Anthony Michael Kreis, and finally, my article:The Goldilocks Paths of Legal Scholarship in a Digital Networked World. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:33 pm by Paul Horwitz
Eric Segall's post on Monday, talking about Justice Scalia, raised the interesting subject of "counter-clerks": those clerks that Justice Scalia hired to provide an in-chambers "liberal" view as a lens for examination and... [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 7:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Last week, I was a guest on Professor Eric Segall's new video/podcast interview show, "Supreme Myths. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:44 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
  Participants in the symposium included Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael Kent Curtis, Scott Powe, William Van Alstyne, Ellen Podgor, Nadine Strossen, Frank Ravitch, Bill Marshall, Arnold Loewy, Jesse Choper, Eric Segall, Kevin Saunders, Russell Weaver, Gene Nichol, Burt Neuborne, and Lyrissa Lidsky. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:56 am by SHG
So yes, these concerns that Eric Segal raises are real to some extent, but it’s not what the Court should do, what we want the Court to do. [read post]