Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 261 - 280 of 447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
Eric Segall of Georgia State University at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:54 am by Mark Tushnet
Eric Segall has an interesting postarguing, against my “against defensive crouch liberalism” piece, that liberals anticipating gaining control of the federal courts should (continue to) advocate for a general stance of judicial deference and restraint, because (a) historically, on balance the courts have enforced anti-progressive views and (b) the Constitution’s values are not progressive ones. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Mystical Link, (June 30, 2019).Cecile Laborde, Abortion, Marriage and Cognate Problems, (American Journal of Jurisprudence (July 2018)).Matthew Segal, America’s Conscience: The Rise of Civil Society Groups Under President Trump, (UCLA Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 6, 2018).Charles A. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:38 am by James Romoser
(Noah Feldman, Bloomberg) Justice Clarence Thomas’ America: Straight, Color-Blind, Religious, and Heavily Armed (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) State supreme courts could soon decide on abortion, raising stakes of their midterm races (James Bikales & Praveena Somasundaram, The Washington Post) Maps in Four States Were Ruled Illegal Gerrymanders. [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:35 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Reforming the Court: Five Non-Partisan and Much Needed Proposals (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) At Supreme Court, New Test of Mandatory Attorney Bar Fees ($) (Marcia Coyle, The National Law Journal) After ‘Water Wars’ Ruling, A Revived Push For States To Share (Molly Samuel, Rob Diaz de Villegas & Stan Ingold, WABE) The post The morning read for Wednesday, May 12 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 7:34 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Democrats are driving a nosedive in Supreme Court ratings (Kelsey Reichmann, Courthouse News Service) Ginni Thomas pressed Wisconsin lawmakers to overturn Biden’s 2020 victory (Emma Brown, The Washington Post) 50 years after landmark death penalty case, Supreme Court’s ruling continues to guide execution debate (Austin Sarat, The Conversation) The Supreme Court’s Breadcrumb Trail (Seana Sugrue, Law & Liberty) Originalism, Deference, and… [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Transparency and its limits at the Supreme Court (Jon Allsop, Columbia Journalism Review) Thomas Keeps Asking Questions as Justices Return to Courtroom (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law) The Misused Concept of “Discrimination” and why SCOTUS Should not Hear the Harvard Affirmative Action Case (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) Making Sense of the Relists in Arlene’s Flowers, Dignity Health, and Roman Catholic Diocese of… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:20 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Trump asks Supreme Court to reject special counsel and stay out of immunity dispute for now (Devan Cole, CNN) The Supreme Court should toss the Colorado case (Ruth Marcus, The Washington Post) Supreme Court will review “good neighbor” air pollution plan (Kelsey Reichmann, Courthouse News) An Originalism Scorecard Since Justice Barrett Arrived on the Court: Living Constitutionalism is Way Ahead (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) Jack Smith… [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 7:05 am by James Romoser
Doerfler & Samuel Moyn, The New York Times) Originalism and the “Major Questions” Doctrine (Ilya Somin, The Volokh Conspiracy) Dobbs Footnote 48, Precedent, and why the Supreme Court is not a Court (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) The post The morning read for Monday, Aug. 22 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:55 am by SCOTUSblog
Urge Supreme Court to Review CFPB Funding Case (Mark Rooney, JD Supra) Top Ten Worst SCOTUS Moments of 2022 (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) The post The morning read for Monday, Dec. 19 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
(Steve Vladeck, Slate) The Supreme Court’s ‘Shadow Docket’ Is Looking Increasingly Shady (Charles Pierce, Esquire) The Roberts Court, First Amendment Fanaticism, and the Myth of Originalism (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) Why the Left Is Wrong to Attack Justice Breyer on Court-Packing (Adam Carrington, The American Spectator) Talk of Breyer retirement swirls, while he questions court’s image ($) (Daniel Cotter, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin) The post The morning… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:06 am by Howard Bashman
” And at “Dorf on Law,” Eric Segall has a blog post titled “The GOP’s Decade-Long Efforts to Kill Voting Rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:33 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: The New York eviction moratorium decision and the problems of the shadow docket (Mark Tushnet, Balkinization) Court rejects CWA challenge, tees up Supreme Court showdown (Jeremy Jacobs & Hannah Northey, E&E News) The Supreme Court Must End Coercive Abortion Mandates (Alexandra DeSanctis, National Review) The Justice Scalia Mythology that Still Haunts our Politics and our Law (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) The post The morning read for… [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:03 am by SHG
Law prof Eric Segall argued that when it involves violence, it should, but then the use of violence as hyperbolic expression on social media is hardly unusual. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 6:41 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: What we know about Justice Clarence Thomas’ hospitalization (Jessica Gresko & Mark Sherman, Associated Press) Kavanaugh tensions simmer behind low-key opening to Jackson hearings (Josh Gerstein & Marianne Levine, Politico) Five Ways Republicans Will Take On Supreme Court Nominee Jackson (Laura Litvan & Greg Stohr, Bloomberg) Attacks on Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Sexual Abuse Cases Are Misleading (Linda Qiu, The New York Times)… [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by James Romoser
Supreme Court takes no action (Neelam Bohra, The Texas Tribune) Texas 6-week abortion ban takes effect after Supreme Court inaction (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) A 6-Week Abortion Ban Took Effect In Texas After The Supreme Court Didn’t Take Immediate Action To Stop It (Zoe Tillman & Nicole Fallert, Buzzfeed News) Biden commission on Supreme Court isn’t moving fast enough — or thinking big enough (Aaron Belkin, Salon) Supreme Myths II: The Roberts Court Years (Eric… [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by SHG
Georgia State lawprof Eric Segall raises some sobering questions at Mike Dorf’s blog. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall observes that on “at least three occasions over the last seven months Justice Samuel Alito has made public remarks about the appropriate role of religion in this country that, if made by a liberal Justice, would likely result in conservative outrage and calls for recusal the next time the Supreme Court hears a case regarding religious liberty”; Segall calls on “conservative Court watchers” to “remember… [read post]