Search for: "Eric Segall"
Results 301 - 320
of 426
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2016, 9:06 pm
" Law professor Eric Segall has this essay online today at The Daily Beast. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
” In The Daily Beast, Eric Segall maintains that in many Supreme Court constitutional law cases, the “Constitution, itself, is the starting point but rarely if ever dictates results,” because the framers “could not foresee nor help us answer today’s difficult constitutional questions. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
"Justices, Like Any Other Judges, Should Not Be Partisans: a Response to Eric Segall. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:47 am
Ailes: #Harassment and #HR — via Jonathan Segal at Next Blog EEOC Boasts “Substantial Progress” of Systemic Program — via Wyatt Employment Law Report Why Subtle Bias Is So Often Worse than Blatant Discrimination — via Harvard Business Review Why millennials aren’t going to solve the nation’s massive racial divides — via Wonkblog Social Media & Technology With Your Social Media Policy, It’s… [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
"Serious About Standing: The Court Should Dismiss Two Out of the Three Major Cases Left": Eric Segall has this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:54 am
Eric Segall has an interesting postarguing, against my “against defensive crouch liberalism” piece, that liberals anticipating gaining control of the federal courts should (continue to) advocate for a general stance of judicial deference and restraint, because (a) historically, on balance the courts have enforced anti-progressive views and (b) the Constitution’s values are not progressive ones. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:33 pm
Eric Segall's post on Monday, talking about Justice Scalia, raised the interesting subject of "counter-clerks": those clerks that Justice Scalia hired to provide an in-chambers "liberal" view as a lens for examination and... [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
" Law professor Eric Segall has this essay at Salon.com. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
” At ACSblog, Eric Segall argues that, unless the Court “is going to reverse current law and return the issue of abortion to the states, both Texas laws should be struck down and a signal sent to the rest of the country that sham anti-choice legislation passed for no purpose other than to make it harder for women to secure safe, affordable abortions will not be tolerated by our highest Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
As Thomas Keck documents in THE MOST ACTIVISTSUPREME COURT IN HISTORY (see also Eric Segall’s fine piece in the Wake Forest Law Review), Scalia was among the least restrained justices who ever sat on the federal bench. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
"Symposium on 'Invisible Justices'": Friday at "Dorf on Law," Eric Segall had a post that begins, "On February 11, the Georgia State University Law Review is hosting a comprehensive symposium on Supreme Court transparency. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Segal, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Change in control, Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Dodd-Frank Act, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Executive turnover, Institutional Investors, ISS, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Say on pay, Securities litigation, Securities Regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Taxation Political Values, Culture, and Corporate Litigation Posted… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am
News, while commentary comes from Garrett Epps for The Atlantic and Eric Segall at ACSblog.Additional coverage of Tuesday’s argument in Heffernan v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:20 am
I have no interest in wading into the morass over Judge Posner and Eric Segall's NYT op-ed suggesting that Justice Scalia believes that majoritarian religious preferences can trump minority rights--here is Corey Yung's effort, which began on Twitter. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:56 am
" Law professor Eric J. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 5:45 pm
Texas": Law professor Eric J. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
por Oscar J. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:26 am
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Richard Posner and Eric Segall discuss recent remarks by Justice Antonin Scalia and conclude that the “logic of his position is that the Supreme Court should get out of the business of enforcing the Constitution altogether, for enforcing it overrides legislation, which is the product of elected officials, and hence of democracy. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:57 pm
Eric Segall (Georgia State) comment. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
” In The Daily Beast, Eric Segall argues that the “Constitution itself has very little to do with most constitutional-law cases, and if the justices are going to exercise a strong power of judicial review, that reality is, indeed, a very good thing. [read post]
