Search for: "Eric Segall"
Results 301 - 320
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Segal, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, January 7, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation disclosure, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Compensation regulation, Director compensation, Dodd-Frank Act, Glass Lewis, ISS, Management, Proxy advisors, Say on frequency, Say on pay, Securities regulation, Taxation, Whistleblowers Sustainability Practices: 2016 Edition Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, Inc., on Sunday, January 8, 2017 Tags:… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:58 am
"Why Trump and the GOP Might not Want to Fill Scalia's Seat": Eric Segall has this post today at the "Dorf on Law" blog. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:50 am
Indiana – State Senator Introduces Ethics Bill to Ban All Gifts from LobbyistsWTHR – Bob Segall | Published: 1/3/2017 Indiana Sen. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:41 am
In any event, we provoked a sur-reply, by Richard Posner and Eric Segall, called “Faux Originalism. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 10:18 am
"SCOTUS Term Limits in the Next Congress": Eric Segall and Gabe Roth have this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:42 am
— via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Exemption Rules Appeal Won’t Be Resolved Before Obama Leaves Office — via Wage & Hour Insights Ignoring the minimum wage is a big deal! [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:42 am
— via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Exemption Rules Appeal Won’t Be Resolved Before Obama Leaves Office — via Wage & Hour Insights Ignoring the minimum wage is a big deal! [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
” At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall maintains that the conventional wisdom that Thomas is a pure originalist is a “myth,” arguing that “Thomas consistently reaches conservative results regardless of whether those results can be justified by reference to the actual words of the Constitution or their original meaning. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Segall has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:14 am
"Divided Government is Great so Why not for SCOTUS": Eric Segall has this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:33 am
” In The Conversation, Eric Segall takes issue with the tendency of “most court watchers” to deplore the current eight-member Supreme Court as “an incomplete, divided legal institution,” arguing that “the longer we have an evenly divided court, the more likely it will be the justices will act more modestly, and take more heed of Hamilton’s warning that they exercise ‘judgment’ not ‘will. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:02 am
Sanders (University of Idaho College of Law); Eric J. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:13 am
Eric Segall at The Daily Beast says, "No. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
Eric Segall contends in The Daily Beast that, contrary to much recent hand-wringing by “legal pundits and academic Court watchers” about the ills of an evenly divided eight-member Court, “there are many advantages to such a Court, and we might all be better off if both political parties in the Senate made a commitment to keep this balance permanent. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 9:06 pm
" Law professor Eric Segall has this essay online today at The Daily Beast. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
” In The Daily Beast, Eric Segall maintains that in many Supreme Court constitutional law cases, the “Constitution, itself, is the starting point but rarely if ever dictates results,” because the framers “could not foresee nor help us answer today’s difficult constitutional questions. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
"Justices, Like Any Other Judges, Should Not Be Partisans: a Response to Eric Segall. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:47 am
Ailes: #Harassment and #HR — via Jonathan Segal at Next Blog EEOC Boasts “Substantial Progress” of Systemic Program — via Wyatt Employment Law Report Why Subtle Bias Is So Often Worse than Blatant Discrimination — via Harvard Business Review Why millennials aren’t going to solve the nation’s massive racial divides — via Wonkblog Social Media & Technology With Your Social Media Policy, It’s… [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
"Serious About Standing: The Court Should Dismiss Two Out of the Three Major Cases Left": Eric Segall has this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:54 am
Eric Segall has an interesting postarguing, against my “against defensive crouch liberalism” piece, that liberals anticipating gaining control of the federal courts should (continue to) advocate for a general stance of judicial deference and restraint, because (a) historically, on balance the courts have enforced anti-progressive views and (b) the Constitution’s values are not progressive ones. [read post]
