Search for: "Eric Segall"
Results 301 - 320
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2016, 8:02 am
Sanders (University of Idaho College of Law); Eric J. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:13 am
Eric Segall at The Daily Beast says, "No. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
Eric Segall contends in The Daily Beast that, contrary to much recent hand-wringing by “legal pundits and academic Court watchers” about the ills of an evenly divided eight-member Court, “there are many advantages to such a Court, and we might all be better off if both political parties in the Senate made a commitment to keep this balance permanent. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 9:06 pm
" Law professor Eric Segall has this essay online today at The Daily Beast. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
” In The Daily Beast, Eric Segall maintains that in many Supreme Court constitutional law cases, the “Constitution, itself, is the starting point but rarely if ever dictates results,” because the framers “could not foresee nor help us answer today’s difficult constitutional questions. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
"Justices, Like Any Other Judges, Should Not Be Partisans: a Response to Eric Segall. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:47 am
Ailes: #Harassment and #HR — via Jonathan Segal at Next Blog EEOC Boasts “Substantial Progress” of Systemic Program — via Wyatt Employment Law Report Why Subtle Bias Is So Often Worse than Blatant Discrimination — via Harvard Business Review Why millennials aren’t going to solve the nation’s massive racial divides — via Wonkblog Social Media & Technology With Your Social Media Policy, It’s… [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
"Serious About Standing: The Court Should Dismiss Two Out of the Three Major Cases Left": Eric Segall has this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:54 am
Eric Segall has an interesting postarguing, against my “against defensive crouch liberalism” piece, that liberals anticipating gaining control of the federal courts should (continue to) advocate for a general stance of judicial deference and restraint, because (a) historically, on balance the courts have enforced anti-progressive views and (b) the Constitution’s values are not progressive ones. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 1:15 pm
Wrongful Imprisonment: Claimant Story - Michael Goodman (Moderator); Kwame Ajamu Structuring Wrongful Imprisonment Claims - John McCulloch and Ryan Jandreau Trusts and Structured Settlements - Dan McCarthy (Moderator); Phillip Krause; Tim Denehy Mediators and Structured Settlements - Connie Klingler (Moderator); Hyram Montero; Len Blonder Projecting Future Economic Damages After the ACA - Roger Bernstein; Noah Katz; Nichole Segal Property & Casualty Insurance Program Growth - (Michael… [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:33 pm
Eric Segall's post on Monday, talking about Justice Scalia, raised the interesting subject of "counter-clerks": those clerks that Justice Scalia hired to provide an in-chambers "liberal" view as a lens for examination and... [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:47 am
The Wall Street Journal reports that “the Syrian regime, emboldened by battlefield victories, is pushing a political solution to end the war that keeps President Bashar al-Assad in power, in defiance of the agenda supported by Russia, his vital ally. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
” Other commentators were equally unimpressed with Diskant’s “bad argument,” including professors Christopher Walker, Eric Segall, and our own Orin Kerr. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
" Law professor Eric Segall has this essay at Salon.com. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 8:09 am
In Sunday’s Foreign Policy Essay, Zack Cooper and Eric Lorber commented on sanctioning China by using statecraft to shape Chinese behavior. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
” At ACSblog, Eric Segall argues that, unless the Court “is going to reverse current law and return the issue of abortion to the states, both Texas laws should be struck down and a signal sent to the rest of the country that sham anti-choice legislation passed for no purpose other than to make it harder for women to secure safe, affordable abortions will not be tolerated by our highest Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Eric Segall argues that predictions of originalism’s demise are misplaced because originalism never had any significant influence in the first place. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
As Thomas Keck documents in THE MOST ACTIVISTSUPREME COURT IN HISTORY (see also Eric Segall’s fine piece in the Wake Forest Law Review), Scalia was among the least restrained justices who ever sat on the federal bench. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
"Symposium on 'Invisible Justices'": Friday at "Dorf on Law," Eric Segall had a post that begins, "On February 11, the Georgia State University Law Review is hosting a comprehensive symposium on Supreme Court transparency. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Segal, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Change in control, Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Dodd-Frank Act, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Executive turnover, Institutional Investors, ISS, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Say on pay, Securities litigation, Securities Regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Taxation Political Values, Culture, and Corporate Litigation Posted… [read post]
