Search for: "Eric Segall"
Results 381 - 400
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2012, 4:55 am
— from Legal Tastings – A Wine Law Blog Labor Relations Breathe Deeply Before You Read: ALJ Finds At-Will Statement Violates NLRA — from Jonathan Segal Thinking About A Different World Under the NLRA — from Michael Fox’s Jottings By An Employer’s Lawyer Waiting for the Dust To Settle on New NLRB Posting Requirement — from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Until next week… [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
” At ACSblog, Eric Segall argues that, unless the Court “is going to reverse current law and return the issue of abortion to the states, both Texas laws should be struck down and a signal sent to the rest of the country that sham anti-choice legislation passed for no purpose other than to make it harder for women to secure safe, affordable abortions will not be tolerated by our highest Court. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:34 am
” At Slate, Eric Segall observes that although Kavanaugh’s nomination “triggered immediate fear among most liberals and progressives,” “[t]here’s a reason … for conservatives to also have anxiety about the … nomination: The rare times in our history that the court has gone as far outside the ideological mainstream as Kavanaugh may well take the court have resulted in major public backlash and even constitutional crisis. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am
Commentary on the cases and oral arguments come from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, David Gans at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Eric Segall at ACSblog, John Culhane at Politico Magazine, Bob Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Adam Winkler at ACSblog, Joseph Mansilla at Adventures in Doctrinal Wonderland, David Upham at The Public Discourse, Karl Laird at Oxford Human Rights Hub,… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Segal, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Change in control, Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Dodd-Frank Act, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Executive turnover, Institutional Investors, ISS, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Say on pay, Securities litigation, Securities Regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Taxation Political Values, Culture, and Corporate Litigation Posted… [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 3:58 am
” At Slate, Eric Segall argues that “no modern justice has allowed originalist principles to block desired political outcomes, and it is extremely unlikely Judge Kavanaugh will break that streak. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall continues the discussion about whether and how to address factual errors in Supreme Court opinions, arguing that “in most cases the Justices should leave the data behind and more transparently highlight the real value choices driving the decisions. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am
” At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall argues that the baker’s “speech claims cannot be satisfactorily resolved on the present record, and therefore the Court should not resolve [them]. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
Supreme Court (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014) Rorie Spill Solberg & Eric N. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
In a podcast at Slate, Adam Liptak and Eric Segall discuss whether “the justices are just as motivated by political and psychological concerns as they are by legal doctrine and case law” with Dahlia Lithwick. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
I gathered myself and said even more loudly (yes I was yelling): "Thank you your Honor, as I was saying, my name is Eric Segall and I.... [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
Louis Keith Robinson wkeithrobinson SMU Cassandra Burke Robinson AndraRobertson Case Western Tom Russell houseofrussell Denver Meghan Ryan MeghanJRyan SMU Matthew Sag matthewsag Loyola Chicago Steve Sanders SteveSSanders Michigan Susan Scafidi CounterfeitChic Fordham Jason Schultz LawGeek Berkeley Michael Scott PrivacyLaw Southwestern Christopher Seaman cbseaman Washington & Lee Paul Secunda psecundaWrkProf Marquette Eric Segall espinsegall Georgia State… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
Louis Keith Robinson wkeithrobinson SMU Cassandra Burke Robinson AndraRobertson Case Western Jennifer Murphy Romig JenniferMRomig Emory Tom Russell houseofrussell Denver Meghan Ryan MeghanJRyan SMU Matthew Sag matthewsag Loyola Chicago Steve Sanders SteveSSanders Michigan Susan Scafidi CounterfeitChic Fordham Jason Schultz LawGeek Berkeley Michael Scott PrivacyLaw Southwestern Christopher Seaman cbseaman Washington & Lee Paul Secunda psecundaWrkProf Marquette … [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
Georgia State lawprof Eric Segall, no fan of Trump he, raised a similar point. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Indeed, my co-blogger Eric Segall wrote an excellent column last week discussing an essay by Thomas Homer-Dixon, a Canadian scholar who studies "the causes of war, social breakdown, revolution, ethnic violence and genocide" and who warned in a recent opinion piece in The Toronto Globe and Mail that "Canada must prepare" for the possible collapse of the American polity.I highly recommend Professor Segall's column, which summarizes the issues… [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm
Washington Jennifer Camero jennifercamero Southern Illinois Paul Caron SoCalTaxProf Cincinnati Elizabeth Carter BitsyNOLA Louisiana State Tim Caulfield CaulfieldTim Alberta Eric Chaffee EricChaffee Toledo Anupam Chander AnupamChander UC Davis Jim Chen chenx064 Michigan State Miriam Cherry Prof_MCherry St. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 6:10 am
The National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) published its final report on March 1. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
By Eric Segall"Only in an Authoritarian Regime is the President Above the Law" … [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
By Eric SegallI have been teaching Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:45 am
That argument in fact came up in an important question posed by Chief Justice Roberts to John Bursch, counsel for the states defending their laws banning same-sex marriage (kudos to legal scholar Eric Segall for correctly predicting that the Chief Justice would be the one to raise this issue): Counsel, I’m not sure it’s necessary to get into sexual orientation to resolve the case. [read post]
