Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 41 - 60 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by JB
ES: Jack, to the best of my knowledge, and maybe I'm wrong, you have never addressed the many historical sources collected by Sylvia Snowiss, Jack Rakove and others showing that the framers quite clearly had a conception of judicial review that was modest, humble, and centered around clear constitutional error (and the 14th did not change that according to the best historians of that time other than possibly for protecting the newly freed slaves). [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:50 am by Ilya Somin
Yesterday, prominent liberal constitutional law scholar Eric Segall (who is no fan of Barrett's) wrote that he "agree[s] with my libertarian friend on this" (the friend in question is me). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Howard Bashman
“The Myth of the Originalist Judge”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 7:05 am by Brian Leiter
You can guess the answer, but I recently came across this systematic study by law professor Eric Segall (Georgia State) and a political scientist. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:05 pm by Howard Wasserman
I missed the introduction of this bill last week, which Eric Segall discusses. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:20 pm by Howard Bashman
“A Tale of Two American Heroes and the Absurdity of Life Tenure for SCOTUS Justices”: Eric Segall has this post at the “Dorf on Law” blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:28 am by Howard Wasserman
As I was completing my prior post on the time passing for Eric Segall's eight-person partisan-divide Court, I thought of a way to save that plan and to put a check on infinite tit-for-tat Court expansion through mutual disarmament: Expand the Court to twelve with three Democratic appointees, then run the Segall plan with a 6-6 partisan divide. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:38 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Justice Souter Speech Every Law Student Should Read”: Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(Eric Segall will be making his second appearance this year.) [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 2:16 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Wally Adeyemo, former deputy national security advisor for International Economics at CSIS will discuss the pandemic’s implications for the global economy with Matthew Goodman, senior vice president for economics at CSIS and Stephanie Segal, senior fellow for economics. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Segall, Adam Feldman, The Elite Teaching The Elite: Who Gets Hired By The Top Law Schools? [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 7:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Last week, I was a guest on Professor Eric Segall's new video/podcast interview show, "Supreme Myths. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 7:30 am by JB
On Wednesday, Eric Segall inaugurated his new video show and podcast, Supreme Myths, by interviewing me about originalism and living constitutionalism, constitutional design, and life tenure for the federal judiciary. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm by Stephen Griffin
  However, this would be the practical equivalent of accepting that there is no strong difference between originalism and living constitutionalism, as Eric Segall and others have urged.This is relevant to "Optimistic Originalism" because the continuing resistance to fully accepting Balkin’s deal has significant implications for the effort by OPM originalists to understand the Reconstruction amendments, the Fourteenth Amendment in particular, in an optimistic… [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
” Exempting places of worship from quarantine orders is a “terrible mistake,” University of Texas Law School’s Sanford Levinson and Georgia State University College of Law’s Eric Segall write in the American Constitution Society Expert Forum. [read post]
17 May 2020, 5:44 am by Adam Kolber
In case you missed it a couple of months ago, Eric Segall concisely skewered Supreme Court constitutional law jurisprudence, offering "10 representative examples that show how judge-made constitutional law is little more than the aggregate of the Justices' value preferences or, on some occasions, the results of bargaining among the Justices to reach a five-vote result that makes little sense. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:09 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Futility of Originalist Analysis in Second Amendment Cases”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]