Search for: "Eric Segall"
Results 61 - 80
of 381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2021, 10:12 am
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Supreme Court takes no action (Neelam Bohra, The Texas Tribune) Texas 6-week abortion ban takes effect after Supreme Court inaction (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) A 6-Week Abortion Ban Took Effect In Texas After The Supreme Court Didn’t Take Immediate Action To Stop It (Zoe Tillman & Nicole Fallert, Buzzfeed News) Biden commission on Supreme Court isn’t moving fast enough — or thinking big enough (Aaron Belkin, Salon) Supreme Myths II: The Roberts Court Years (Eric… [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:06 am
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 5:04 am
By Eric SegallI grew up forty-five minutes from Manhattan and worked for two summers as a law firm messenger in New York City. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 10:36 am
“Originalism Diluted”: Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 10:10 am
Id. at 237, 238; see also Eric J. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:33 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: The New York eviction moratorium decision and the problems of the shadow docket (Mark Tushnet, Balkinization) Court rejects CWA challenge, tees up Supreme Court showdown (Jeremy Jacobs & Hannah Northey, E&E News) The Supreme Court Must End Coercive Abortion Mandates (Alexandra DeSanctis, National Review) The Justice Scalia Mythology that Still Haunts our Politics and our Law (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) The post The morning read for… [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 10:20 am
“The Justice Scalia Mythology that Still Haunts our Politics and our Law”: Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
By Eric Segall"Only in an Authoritarian Regime is the President Above the Law" … [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:21 am
Eric Segall discusses everything wrong with the Court's 11th Amendment/sovereign immunity jurisprudence, discussing its evolution and incoherence. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 11:16 am
Satz (Emory), Julie Seaman (Emory), Eric Segall (Georgia State), Fred O. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:50 am
“The Law & Liberty Blog, Broken Clocks, and the Dangers of Philosopher Judges”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:35 am
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Reforming the Court: Five Non-Partisan and Much Needed Proposals (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) At Supreme Court, New Test of Mandatory Attorney Bar Fees ($) (Marcia Coyle, The National Law Journal) After ‘Water Wars’ Ruling, A Revived Push For States To Share (Molly Samuel, Rob Diaz de Villegas & Stan Ingold, WABE) The post The morning read for Wednesday, May 12 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
11 May 2021, 5:20 pm
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:47 am
Tomorrow evening at 8 PM Eastern Time, I am joining four other profs (Neysoun Mahboubi, Eric Segall, Marin Levy, and Tom Ginsburg) and two journalists (Dahlia Lithwick and Emily Bazelon) to discuss Biden’s SCOTUS Commission on Clubhouse. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:20 am
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
” His reasoning is extremely problematic.As Professor Eric Segall noted on my blog earlier this week, the Roberts Court free speech jurisprudence is highly nonoriginalist, even anti-originalist. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
(Steve Vladeck, Slate) The Supreme Court’s ‘Shadow Docket’ Is Looking Increasingly Shady (Charles Pierce, Esquire) The Roberts Court, First Amendment Fanaticism, and the Myth of Originalism (Eric Segall, Dorf on Law) Why the Left Is Wrong to Attack Justice Breyer on Court-Packing (Adam Carrington, The American Spectator) Talk of Breyer retirement swirls, while he questions court’s image ($) (Daniel Cotter, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin) The post The morning… [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 7:35 am
“The Roberts Court, First Amendment Fanaticism, and the Myth of Originalism”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 10:30 pm
Eric Segall has commented on Professor Terbeek's article over at Dorf on Law. [read post]
