Search for: "Eric Segall"
Results 161 - 180
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2021, 7:35 am
“The Roberts Court, First Amendment Fanaticism, and the Myth of Originalism”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 10:30 pm
Eric Segall has commented on Professor Terbeek's article over at Dorf on Law. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 10:23 am
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 6:10 am
The National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) published its final report on March 1. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:02 pm
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:11 pm
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:05 am
Segall has this post at the blog of the American Constitution Society. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:25 pm
” Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 8:07 am
” Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:42 am
” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm
“The Court Should Reject Religious Supremacy in Philadelphia but it Won’t”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm
“The Obamacare Case for Dummies (and everyone else)”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:26 am
(Jonathan Adler, The Volokh Conspiracy) Justice Barrett (Human Rights At Home Blog) Barrett Faces Gauntlet of Challenges in First Weeks As Justice (Kevin Daley, The Washington Free Beacon) In Nominating Amy Coney Barrett To The Supreme Court, Trump Is Following In The Footsteps Of Lyndon Johnson And Richard Nixon (Michael Bobelian, Forbes) Breaking and Analysis: Supreme Court, on 5-3 Party Line Vote, Won’t Restore Wisconsin Ballot Deadline Extension; Justices Fight in Footnotes over… [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Eric SegallThanks, Jack for engaging with these two questions. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
ES: Jack, to the best of my knowledge, and maybe I'm wrong, you have never addressed the many historical sources collected by Sylvia Snowiss, Jack Rakove and others showing that the framers quite clearly had a conception of judicial review that was modest, humble, and centered around clear constitutional error (and the 14th did not change that according to the best historians of that time other than possibly for protecting the newly freed slaves). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
“The Myth of the Originalist Judge”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 7:05 am
You can guess the answer, but I recently came across this systematic study by law professor Eric Segall (Georgia State) and a political scientist. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:05 pm
I missed the introduction of this bill last week, which Eric Segall discusses. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:20 pm
“A Tale of Two American Heroes and the Absurdity of Life Tenure for SCOTUS Justices”: Eric Segall has this post at the “Dorf on Law” blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:28 am
As I was completing my prior post on the time passing for Eric Segall's eight-person partisan-divide Court, I thought of a way to save that plan and to put a check on infinite tit-for-tat Court expansion through mutual disarmament: Expand the Court to twelve with three Democratic appointees, then run the Segall plan with a 6-6 partisan divide. [read post]
