Search for: "Erie R. Co. v. New York"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Cherrington v Erie Ins. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am
When he was subsequently terminated, he filed suit in federal court in New York asserting claims for disability discrimination in violation of the ADA and sexual orientation discrimination in violation of state and local law. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:04 am
Maatman, Jr. and Gina R. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 12:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:13 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the phrase "arising out of" is interpreted as "originating from, incident to, or having connection with" (Maroney v New York Cent. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm
Erie Coach Lines Co. (17 N.Y.3d 306, 929 N.Y.S.2d 41 [2011]) The New York Court of Appeals clarified choice of law analysis in a multi-party case. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Co., 55 AD3d 879, 880-881), and defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
The seminal case on this issue under New York law is Kawa v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
City of New York framework to analyze his takings claim. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:25 am
Supreme Court's 2001 holding in Zadvydas v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:17 pm
According to Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm
Brady and the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court case Sehl v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:09 am
Co. v Utica First Ins. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 7:32 am
New York Cent. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
" John Doe Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am
Other judges, from York and Adams counties, have followed suit.The main rationale put forth in those severance decisions is primarily that evidence of "insurance" is not admissible in personal injury civil litigation matters under Pa.R.E. 411. [read post]
