Search for: "Ernster v. State"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
(Most states do not view these opinions as precedent but have varying rules on citing them.)But, is this a way for judges to avoid appellate review? [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:31 am
No surprise, then, that there is a developing body of "Bitcoin Law".Some notable "Bitcoin Laws":the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a consumer advisory in August 2014 the IRS determined that Bitcoin should be treated as property for tax purposes - see IRS Notice 2014-21 New York State Dept. of Financial Services has issued proposed regulations of virtual currenciesUnited States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm
Ernster, the Virtual Library Cat [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 4:00 pm
But last Thursday, when the Court decided Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 11:11 am
Ernster, the Virtual Library Cat [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 5:23 pm
Ernster, the Virtual Library Cat [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 4:20 am
The cornerstone is the presentation, as images and searchable text, of the transcript of the 3,200 pages of proceedings from the murder trial of State of Illinois v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
Bower v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
Attorneys eligible are not limited to Plaintiffs’ National Liaison Counsel and members of Plaintiffs’ National Steering Committee, but include, for example, other attorneys called upon by them to assist in performing their responsibilities, State Liaison Counsel, and other attorneys performing similar responsibilities in state court actions in which the presiding state-court judge has imposed similar obligations upon plaintiffs to contribute to the fund.… [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
” Hall v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
