Search for: "Estate of Murphy v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 3:30 am
United States (2019). [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
In Giaimo, the trial court adopted the hearing officer’s recommendation to apply a so-called “Murphy discount” — named after Murphy v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 1:02 pm
Lopez (268-281) United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
The United States Department of Transportation estimates that human error accounted for 94% of these crashes. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:57 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
Justice Thomas recognized this analysis in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
United States is cited in the following article: Nick Katz, How the States can Fix Sell: Forced Medication of Mentally Ill Criminal Defendants in State Courts, 69 Duke L.J. 735 (2019). 2. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 10:40 am
Murphy, (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1280–81).) [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm
Murphy, 100 N.J. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
Getting a PhD in law / Caroline Morris and Cian Murphy. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
This is itself an interesting question in a world where the General Assembly has stated that marriage can only involve a man and woman but the federal court has ruled that this legal distinction is not legally permissible under the United State Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Its more than 2,700 members practice throughout the United States, Canada and other foreign countries. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
