Search for: "Estes v. Anglin"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Anglin v Resler, 2020 ABCA 184 (CanLII) [16] Vicarious liability is not a distinct tort but “a theory that holds one person responsible for the misconduct of another because of the relationship between them”: 671122 Ontario v Sagaz Industries Canada, 2001 SCC 59, para 25, [2001] 2 SCR 983. [read post]
