Search for: "Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc." Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Richard J. Simmons
Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc.*, which examined whether trial courts can strike PAGA claims on manageability grounds. [read post]
Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 685, the outcome of which may affect how trial courts manage their dockets and how parties raise and defend PAGA claims. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm by Hilary Habib
Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., ruled that courts do not have authority to strike a claim under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) due to a lack of manageability at trial. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm by Bryan Hawkins and Robert Sarkisian
Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District created a split in authority when they held that wage-and-hour lawsuits brought under California’s Private Attorneys General Act cannot be dismissed on manageability grounds. [read post]
Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. holding that a trial court cannot strike a PAGA claim on manageability grounds because to do so would be “inconsistent with a plaintiff’s statutory right to bring such a claim and is beyond a trial court’s inherent authority. [read post]