Search for: "Ethan Leib"
Results 1 - 20
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
This interpretation is similar to that of Andrew Kent, Jed Shugerman and Ethan Leib in their article “Faithful Execution and Article II,” in which they argue that this clause imposes a “duty of fidelity” on the president. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm
To celebrate the book and its authors, the Center held a symposium at Georgetown that featured critical responses to A Great Power of Attorney by Ethan Leib and Jed Shugerman, Richard Primus, Suzanna Sherry, and myself. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:15 pm
Constitution may impose limits on the power of the President to act out of private self-interest or against the direction of Congress, according to a Harvard Law Review article by professors Andrew Kent, Ethan Leib, and Jed Shugerman of Fordham University School of Law. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:55 am
A soon-to-be-published article by one of us (Kent), co-authored with Ethan Leib and Jed Shugerman, shows that the plain or dictionary meaning of the Take Care Clause in 1787 was consistent with a specialized meaning that had developed over the centuries in Anglo-American law. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:10 pm
Tal Kastner (New York University School of Law) & Ethan J. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:52 am
Written by Andrew Kent, Ethan Leib, and Jed Shugerman, the paper, which is being published in the Harvard Law Review, sheds new light on the Clause. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 8:21 am
Jack Goldsmith and John Manning have studied the “protean” nature of the clause and the many contradictory interpretations that courts have adopted; here, Mueller’s analysis has some resemblance to the understanding set out by Andrew Kent, Ethan Leib and Jed Shugerman, who argue that the Take Care Clause imposes a “duty of fidelity” on the president. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:09 pm
The opinion has received no shortage of criticism, including by the three well-articulated dissents and responses on this blog by Ethan Leib and Tal Kastner. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
As Ethan Leib and I explore in Contract Creep, forthcoming in the Georgetown Law Journal, scholars and judges widely accept that so-called “sophisticated party” transactions should be treated differently than consumer or employment transactions involving individuals. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:54 pm
Leib and Stephen R. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm
Galoob and Ethan J. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
Scholars have offered a range of opinions on the issue, including Eric Muller, Richard Epstein, Michael McConnell, Andrew Kent, Ethan Leib, and Jed Shugerman, but no consensus has yet emerged. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 8:31 am
From the abstract for Andrew Kent, Ethan J. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:03 am
Andrew Kent (Fordham University School of Law), Ethan J. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:34 am
New Light on the Original Meaning of Article II of the Constitution A new paper I co-authored with Ethan Leib and Jed Shugerman suggests that these views are deeply inconsistent with the original meaning of Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:30 am
Andrew Kent, Ethan J. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 12:59 pm
Andrew Kent (Fordham University School of Law), Ethan J. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 12:06 pm
Brudney (Fordham University School of Law) & Ethan J. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:45 am
Stephen Galoob (University of Tulsa College of Law) & Ethan J. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
” (Professors Jed Shugarman and Ethan Leib have presented a different argument regarding self-pardons and the Take Care Clause, available here.) [read post]
