Search for: "Eugene Scalia" Results 81 - 100 of 431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm by Mike Rappaport
One would expect that Justice Scalia and Thomas, at least, would disapprove of this description of what the Court is supposed to be doing. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:12 am by Walter Olson
Department of Justice: we’re going to use that Dear Colleague Title IX letter as a basis for prosecution, and colleges are going to need to crack down on speech if they want to stay in compliance [Eugene Volokh, Scott Greenfield, and FIRE, on University of New Mexico case] A brief history of how we got here from the Dear Colleague letter [Justin Dillon and Matt Kaiser, L.A. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) As I’ve mentioned before, we don’t know much about Elena Kagan’s views on particular free speech cases, largely because much of her work has been analysis and synthesis of existing doctrine, rather than prescription about the way things ought to be. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention panel discussion on Justice Scalia, originalism, and the First Amendment with Profs. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
Speakers will include Justices Scalia and Alito, Senators Mike Lee and Orin Hatch, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former ACLU head Nadine Strossen, Carly Fiorina, and former BB&T Corp. head John Allison (now head of Cato). [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Earlier today, I blogged the syllabus of the majority opinion, and noted my earlier thoughts that the statute is likely constitutional. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 7:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Antonin Scalia made many positive contributions to administrative law. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 2:24 pm
It's sentencing day over at The Volokh Conspiracy: Eugene Volokh riffs here on the extreme sodomy sentence in Georgia (discussed here and with comments ablaze); Orin Kerr riffs here on Judge Fogel's ruling essentially declaring California's administration of lethal injection unconstitutional (discussed here and here). [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Yesterday, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press had this article discussing Justice Stevens's longevity on the Court; the state of the docket; and Justice Scalia's absence at the Court's annual spring concert. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:09 am
On that general issue, all the justices disagree, but Justices Scalia, Thomas and Kagan disagreed on how (and whether) to apply the standard in this case. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Here are today’s opinion and the earlier opinion holding that plaintiffs had standing to sue. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  --DRE  ICYMI: Seven historians say Justice Clarence Thomas erred in writing in Box that “[f]rom the beginning, birth control and abortion were promoted as a means of effectuating eugenics. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Deb Lindsey/For The Washington Post) The naming of George Mason University School of Law after the late Justice Antonin Scalia prompts this question: What other justices have law schools named after them? [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 11:14 am
Some related post-Heller posts: Justice Scalia sells out felon gun rights, but on what basis exactly? [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Goes into Scalia’s sensitive places as evidence that some places are not sensitive and therefore there is a right to carry in those places. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Craig drew a sharp dissent from Justice Scalia, joined by Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens; the dissent argued that the Confrontation Clause required face-to-face confrontation. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Occasionally, I hear people arguing that judges’ decisions are strongly influenced by their sex, race, and so on — “of course, this female judge will rule against the accused rapist / pornographer / sexual harasser / etc.; she’s a woman.” [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
But this is the first time that I’ve noticed Scalia refuse to join footnotes that have nothing to do with legislative history, and that simply express no opinion on an issue. [read post]