Search for: "Evans v. Social Security Administration" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Virginia – used the power of judicial review to raise the professional standards of American public administrators in the fields of education, law enforcement, electoral administration, and family law. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am by Joanna L. Grossman
  Couples with the benefit of a full marriage can now benefit from a wide variety of federal rights, including those related to income and estate taxes, immigration, and social security. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
The Evan Law blog has a summary of the recent decision Allen v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
The setting for the resolution of this conundrum arises from within the lower and most ministerial of the rungs of government administration within the States of our federal union. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Google’s Chief Privacy Officer wrote a blog post explaining the company’s plans to abide by the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules system. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
” The report explored the “opportunities as well as significant concerns for everyday life, health, work, and security. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has also published a blog post outlining what Musk should do to protect privacy and security for Twitter users. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am by INFORRM
For, as Griffiths LJ said, in Lion Laboratories v Evans [1985] QB 526, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the iniquity is such as to make it vital the confidential information is published directly to the public. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
  There is a post about this on the Privacy and Information Security Law Blog. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
” The Department of Justice and the Obama administration have joined with the FBI. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Sex and gender, in Shapiro’s view, are biological, not socially constructed.All of this is a bit mysterious, if one takes the professed libertarianism seriously. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Securing Innovation),Mike Masnick on IP: (Patent Troll Tracker),Trifurcation and IP valuation: (IP finance),Jordan Hatcher article ‘Implementing open data: the open data commons project’: (opencontentlawyer.com),Online markets and IP trading exchanges: (IP finance),INTERPOL announces an international IP crime database: (Class 46), (Spicy IP),New free IP database: WIPO magazine launched! [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
As a consequence, the appointment of Stevens’ successor by a Democratic President with a Democratic Senate is unlikely to shift the Court’s rulings on most important social issues, such as abortion, affirmative action, religion, and gay rights. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm by bndmorris
Smith, Asking Too Much: The Ninth Circuit’s Erroneous Review of Social Security Disability Determinations, 26 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]