Search for: "Evans v. Social Security Administration"
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
There is a post about this on the Privacy and Information Security Law Blog. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am
Nigel Evans MP, as with Max Clifford, was tried for serious sexual offences. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The inventor secures exclusive rights in return for new, ingenious, useful and unobvious disclosures and dedication of the invention to the public when the term expires. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Sago 13-593Issue: Whether Evans v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
Couples with the benefit of a full marriage can now benefit from a wide variety of federal rights, including those related to income and estate taxes, immigration, and social security. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Social Security Administration, for example, applies a place-of-residence rule when determining whether an individual can apply for benefits based a spouse’s earning records. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
The first section unpacks the concept of law--common law, equity, statutes, regulation and law beyond law (social norms, and functional law. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
Evans b*tch *ss boyfriend [this is referring to defendant Gygatz] too He a p*ssy *ss n*gg* tryna talk sh*t while walking away’ Rosario v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
This provision has created chaos: Couples who were legally married in their home states were nevertheless treated as single by the federal government for purposes ranging from immigration, to taxes, to Social Security Accordingly, Section Three has been repeatedly challenged in court. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Aiello and Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
On the other hand, if users post content to social networking sites “using more secure privacy settings, [this] reflect[s] the user’s intent to preserve information as private” and may engender Fourth Amendment protection. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am
Congress, it said, believed at the time it passed DOMA that it would reduce tax revenues and raise Social Security payments — arguments that, it said, would satisfy such a minimal standard of review. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/J9p95f (Sharon Nelson) Is Social Media Disrupting Your Trials? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am
European Security and Defense Policy » Congresses. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Citizens - http://bit.ly/vkPXsF (Gibbons) Watchdog (SEC) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
Evans.) [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
(See, for example: Eysoldt v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
Naim (1956), an error later rectified in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
- elderly retirees who do not have the Social Security benefits they would have received if their spouse were of the opposite sex [read post]
