Search for: "Evers v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 1 - 20
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 1:25 pm
Jurisprudence on independent medical examinations (IME) in the context of the employer’s duty to accommodate is sparse. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:48 am
Highlights from the new EPO guidelines for examination 2021: ViCo oral proceedings, description amendments and antibodies (14 Feb 2021)Illumina v MGI Part 2: Has the UK lost its way on the doctrine of equivalents? [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
With the ever-increasing popularity of medical spas, legal questions surrounding ownership become ever more important to address. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
This case, based on an investigation by the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners (“TBVME”) into Dr. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:35 pm
In Vowels v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:08 am
Upon the completion of such examination the medical board shall report and certify to the board whether such beneficiary is or is not totally or partially incapacitated physically or mentally and whether he or she is or is not engaged in or able to engage in a gainful occupation. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:11 am
The case, DeMuth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:40 am
” Clairol, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:31 am
In Bedford Somerset MHMR v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 4:20 pm
Walker v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
The Board is not called upon to decide whether the Examining Division was or was not correct in this matter, but merely to decide whether the Examining Division arrived at this conclusion in a reasonable way.6.3 The Board can accept that the Examining Division faced the difficulty that the Guidelines do not define what "sufficiently substantiated" means in the case of illness. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
The Board is not called upon to decide whether the Examining Division was or was not correct in this matter, but merely to decide whether the Examining Division arrived at this conclusion in a reasonable way.6.3 The Board can accept that the Examining Division faced the difficulty that the Guidelines do not define what "sufficiently substantiated" means in the case of illness. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
Infant plaintiff’s mother (herein “plaintiff-mother”) is a physician Board Certified in Internal Medicine. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:54 pm
One of the first things that ever puzzled him was Swiss-style claims and their place in an otherwise well-run world. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
So we’re on day 9 at the Cleveland Clinic, the only medical facility in the world where it’s actually a good think to say you’re at the Clinic. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 9:20 am
And that Board often won’t issue an order unless the veteran can first supply a specific reason for thinking the examiner incompetent. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
As ever in decisions on stays in the UK Courts, this case very much turned on the facts. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
The WCJ reviewed deposition testimony of two doctors who had performed Independent Medical Examinations (more accurately known as Defense Medical Exams), and also a deposition of Claimant’s treating neurologist. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
‘Never ever. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:03 am
This concept was again tested by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Leca v. [read post]
