Search for: "Evers v. Watson" Results 1 - 20 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 7:43 am by Ernie Svenson
Still, as IBM's Robert Weber points out Watson "won't ever replace attorneys; after all, the essence of good lawyering is mature and sound reasoning, and there's simply no way a machine can match the knowledge and ability to reason of a smart, well-educated and deeply experienced human being. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 8:32 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Ever since Watson and Crick ended their seminal Nature paper in 1953 by saying that: "It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material," James Watson & Francis Crick, "Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids; A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid," Nature 171: 737-38 (April 25, 1953), it has been envisioned that identification of genetic… [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
  The question is important for the regimes that triggered the references, but in the background is a larger question: can mass retention of data ever being human rights compliant. [read post]