Search for: "Evers v. Watson" Results 81 - 100 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  There were also posts from: The Optanon blog, which described is as perhaps the most “significant piece of privacy legislation ever”. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
 Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:12 am by Legal Beagle
He is thought to be the only candidate to ever run in a constituency – Aberdeen South – which he was legally barred from entering. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
Watson Pharms., 8 No. 5 Westlaw Journal Expert and Scientific Evidence 10, Westlaw Journal Expert and Scientific Evidence April 20, 2011A California judge has ordered Watson Pharmaceuticals to turn over key documents and other data about a pain patch that allegedly caused a user to overdose on fentanyl. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
" Swift J, Cleghorn v Oldham [1927] 43 TLR 465Some would say that sport is a reflection of life itself. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
Apotex) (5/21/07)Preemption news (Levine v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am by Legal Beagle
Private law firm LEVY MCRAE, who also represented shamed Glasgow City Council Boss & self confessed cocaine addict Steven Purcell were used in the operation to silence reporting of the abuse allegations, with senior partner Peter Watson dispatching a series of letters to online media outlets and even the Press Complaints Commission over the affair, which is reported HERE. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 30 January 2018, in the case of Watson v Home Secretary ([2018] EWCA Civ 70) confirmed that section 1 of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 was inconsistent with EU in certain important respects. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
That trend has increased in electronic commerce transactions especially at the business to consumer level as terms have become ever more protective of the drafter. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The initiative advocates website-blocking and has received ever intensifying concern from supporters of open media. [read post]