Search for: "Evers v. Watson"
Results 121 - 140
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
The IPKat's French friend Asim Singh brings fresh news from Paris concerning the ever-popular pastime of les Françaises -- litigating Google AdWords. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm
A prior S2KM blog post examines these three defense strategies in the context of the Spencer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
Bob Watson Chevrolet-Geo, Inc., 112 F.3d 283 (7th Cir. 1997), and Cornist v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
They’re looking not just at who’s qualified to be an expert, Watson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:19 am
Dillon-Watson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm
" The Court's opinion also comments on issues regarding subjective decision making and disparate impact claims, questions that were left largely unanswered in the Court's splinter decision in Watson v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
Watson, Ferndale, MISTGSN Steven T. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
Watson Pharms., 8 No. 5 Westlaw Journal Expert and Scientific Evidence 10, Westlaw Journal Expert and Scientific Evidence April 20, 2011A California judge has ordered Watson Pharmaceuticals to turn over key documents and other data about a pain patch that allegedly caused a user to overdose on fentanyl. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Neither officer was aware that either the driver or the defendant had ever been arrested. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:43 pm
It is arguable that if ever there was a need for the civil Court to provide a deterrent it is here. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:46 am
Today, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Ever wonder why we never hear how Watson responded to his boss? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am
On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:43 am
Still, as IBM's Robert Weber points out Watson "won't ever replace attorneys; after all, the essence of good lawyering is mature and sound reasoning, and there's simply no way a machine can match the knowledge and ability to reason of a smart, well-educated and deeply experienced human being. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Even when modernizing the law of comment (WIC Radio & Mair v Simpson [2008] 2 SCR 420) and creating a new “public interest responsible communication” defence (Grant v Torstar Corp [2009] SCC 61) the court failed to take the step of importing Charter analysis or standards into the common law[12] As to the English solution of Reynolds, Eady J comments sadly that the Reynolds defence “seems hardly ever to be used in litigation. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
"23 In Craven v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
The point was discussed by the Information Tribunal in the 2007 case of Bluck v Information Commissioner (EA/2006/0090) held that a hospital owed a continuing duty of confidence to the dead woman which was actionable by her next of kin after her death. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
(No previous convention had ever been held west of Chicago.) [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:48 pm
This was accelerated by the California Supreme Court's decision in People v Watson, where the Court said that a drunk driver could have the required "malice"…whatever that is. [read post]
