Search for: "Ex Parte Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2013, 7:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
from Ex parte ArnoldOf background:The Examiner has rejected claims 1, 2, 41 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:21 am by admin
Ex-Sichenzia Ross Partner Sues Baker Botts for $35M, Alleging Extortion on Behalf of Ex-Client” — “Harvey Kesner, a former partner at New York-based securities litigation firm Sichenzia Ross Ference, is suing Baker Botts and one of its partners for $35 million, accusing the Am Law 100 firm of extortion for its threats to sue on behalf of his former client, who is separately suing Kesner for alleged conflicts and fraud. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:24 am by Benjamin Wittes
Its attack on Bush’s antiterror programs was part of that same doubled-down bet. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm by Carl Folsom
Baker (Oct. 1, 2009), the Kentucky Supreme Court held that KRS 17.545, which restricts where registered sex offenders may live, could not be applied to those who committed their offenses prior to July 12, 2006, the effective date of the statute. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 11:08 am by Anthony McCain
Nym: Thoughts On Ex Parte Khvorova The Process Of Invention Now And Then Get a Job doing Patent Law Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC Dilworth IP Faegre Baker Daniels Finch & Maloney PLLC Intel [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:28 am by The Docket Navigator
Plaintiff's motion to lift a stay following the PTO's Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate was granted. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
Baker Sch Dist 5J 481 F.3d 770, 47 IDELR 182 (9th Cir. 4/3/2007). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:07 am
Matal, Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-425-LMB-IDD (October 26, 2017).Section 1071(b)(3) provides that, in a civil action for review of an ex parte decision of the USPTO, "all the expenses of the proceeding shall be paid by the party bringing the case, whether the final decision is in favor of such party or not. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:30 am by David Glazier
The court subsequently extended this holding to military commissions, declaring in Ex parte Vallandigham that the commissions were not an exercise of judicial authority. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
The previously declassified opinion required no such discussion since the ruling was entirely ex parte. [read post]