Search for: "Ex Parte Baker" Results 201 - 220 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2010, 9:17 pm by Josh Wright
To be sure, some of the Commission attorneys responsible for reviewing mergers ex ante and/or explaining to the Commission how they planned to present and defend their challenges in court or in Part 3 were consulted in connection with the project. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:30 am by Stefanie Levine
We therefore report new ex parte and inter partes reexamination requests filed electronically the previous week as they appear on the Patent Office PAIR system. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
One might arguably understand and appreciate the Vreeland holding in an era when the law of wrongful death was still in its relative infancy; human life spans were shorter, and given the state of technology, industry, and law, accidental death was a more common part of the American landscape than it is today. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:28 am by The Docket Navigator
Plaintiff's motion to lift a stay following the PTO's Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate was granted. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
May 17, 2010), and the damages award was $14 million in compensatory damages, $1 million in punitive damages against the plaintiff’s ex-wife, and $1 million in punitive damages against the police officer who was the ex-wife’s secret lover; the ex-wife and the police officer were found to have conspired to hide the relationship, and to get rid of a possibly exculpatory diary written by one of the children. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am by INFORRM
In a later post Roy Greenslade returns to the question of whether Ms Perroncel has consistently denied the affair, concluding that “the Grazia interview, conducted in mid-May, is part of a consistent patten of denials”. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Judge Garland was also part of a unanimous panel that upheld a Park Service regulation; the Supreme Court subsequently vacated the ruling on the ground that the suit was not ripe. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
Supp. 740, 781 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff’d in pertinent part, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987). [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:55 am by Bernard Hibbitts
See Reid, 354 U.S. 1, 34 n.61 (1957); see also Ex parte Mudd (milt. comm. 1868) and United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
" Part of the problem also appears to be that, according to the District Court, the EEOC's complaint was not properly pled, indicating perhaps some lack of expertise by the attorneys in charge.The court determined that this failure deprived the employer of the opportunity to settle the complaint. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Guest Barista
  That according to a 1986 BPAI decision, Ex Parte Krepelka, the applicants didn’t need to provide data showing efficacy in humans, and the animal test data already present in the application was sufficient. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm by Carl Folsom
Baker (Oct. 1, 2009), the Kentucky Supreme Court held that KRS 17.545, which restricts where registered sex offenders may live, could not be applied to those who committed their offenses prior to July 12, 2006, the effective date of the statute. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am by KC Johnson
Since the Durham attorneys don’t explain why they cited Francis, it’s difficult to guess why they thought the case was relevant, but presumably they believed that a finding of qualified immunity for O’Malley would somehow bolster their claim that various Durham police officials and ex-City Manager Patrick Baker deserve qualified immunity. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
Boyejo & Ors, R (on the application of) v Barnet London Borough Council [2009] EWHC 3261 (Admin) This was the conjoined hearing of an application for Judicial Review of both Barnet and Portsmouth Councils, both JRs bought by Yvonne Hossack and here represented by Stephen Knafler. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
Boyejo & Ors, R (on the application of) v Barnet London Borough Council [2009] EWHC 3261 (Admin) This was the conjoined hearing of an application for Judicial Review of both Barnet and Portsmouth Councils, both JRs bought by Yvonne Hossack and here represented by Stephen Knafler. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm
What initially makes Jake unusual is that he has been tapped to inhabit a part-alien, part-human body that he controls, like a puppeteer, from its head to its prehensile tail. [read post]