Search for: "Ex Parte Baker" Results 201 - 220 of 248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Judge Garland was also part of a unanimous panel that upheld a Park Service regulation; the Supreme Court subsequently vacated the ruling on the ground that the suit was not ripe. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
Supp. 740, 781 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff’d in pertinent part, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
" Part of the problem also appears to be that, according to the District Court, the EEOC's complaint was not properly pled, indicating perhaps some lack of expertise by the attorneys in charge.The court determined that this failure deprived the employer of the opportunity to settle the complaint. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Guest Barista
  That according to a 1986 BPAI decision, Ex Parte Krepelka, the applicants didn’t need to provide data showing efficacy in humans, and the animal test data already present in the application was sufficient. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm by Carl Folsom
Baker (Oct. 1, 2009), the Kentucky Supreme Court held that KRS 17.545, which restricts where registered sex offenders may live, could not be applied to those who committed their offenses prior to July 12, 2006, the effective date of the statute. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am by KC Johnson
Since the Durham attorneys don’t explain why they cited Francis, it’s difficult to guess why they thought the case was relevant, but presumably they believed that a finding of qualified immunity for O’Malley would somehow bolster their claim that various Durham police officials and ex-City Manager Patrick Baker deserve qualified immunity. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
Boyejo & Ors, R (on the application of) v Barnet London Borough Council [2009] EWHC 3261 (Admin) This was the conjoined hearing of an application for Judicial Review of both Barnet and Portsmouth Councils, both JRs bought by Yvonne Hossack and here represented by Stephen Knafler. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
Boyejo & Ors, R (on the application of) v Barnet London Borough Council [2009] EWHC 3261 (Admin) This was the conjoined hearing of an application for Judicial Review of both Barnet and Portsmouth Councils, both JRs bought by Yvonne Hossack and here represented by Stephen Knafler. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm
What initially makes Jake unusual is that he has been tapped to inhabit a part-alien, part-human body that he controls, like a puppeteer, from its head to its prehensile tail. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
There, I was always on the opposite side of cops, except for the one time I defended an ex-cop. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We do so here with respect to the Court's punitive damages/Due Process jurisprudence.That means we can essentially ignore the Part II of the Underwood article, entitled "Judicial Tort Reform of Punitive Damages. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
"o o April 1, 2009 decision hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki hereo o Noted here: Baker Hostetler; Colorado Employment Law Blog; ConstangyArgued - Awaiting DecisionAT&T v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
Sometimes work intrudes.On April 1st, the CCA issued opinions in the following cases:AP-76,031, Ex parte David William Baker (Keasler, J.)(8:1): Here the CCA held that Baker was entitled to street time credit when the State erroneously released him even though the State issued a warrant after he went to China. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:04 pm
Noting that it had previously held in Ex parte Hale and Ex parte Rowe (and see the bonus summary here) that a defendant is entitled to street time credit towards the discharge of his sentence when he's erroneously released through no fault of his own. [read post]