Search for: "Ex Parte Baker" Results 121 - 140 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2013, 9:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lego spoon designed to connect with real Legos; auto parts; etc. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
However, part of Florida’s standard jury instruction 3.6(f), Justifiable Use of Deadly Force, instructs the jury that when they “consider the issue of self-defense, they may take into account the relative physical abilities and capacities of the defendant and the victim. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
However, part of Florida’s standard jury instruction 3.6(f), Justifiable Use of Deadly Force, instructs the jury that when they “consider the issue of self-defense, they may take into account the relative physical abilities and capacities of the defendant and the victim. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Chief Judge Baker concurred in the judgment, largely criticizing the majority for such a simplistic (and analytically questionable) approach to the question presented. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:07 am by Gregory McNeal
Baker, Deputy Legal Adviser to the NSC under President Clinton, Baker wrote: “In my experience, the United States does a better job at incorporating intelligence into its targeting decisions than it does in using intelligence to explain those decisions after the fact. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
from Ex parte ArnoldOf background:The Examiner has rejected claims 1, 2, 41 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:02 am by lopeznoriega
Ley de Exámenes Finales ¡Maestra, Alejandro no se deja copiar! [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:47 am by lopeznoriega
Observé la entrega de nuevo mobiliario para la oficina del profesor Gold por parte del Departamento de Recursos Materiales. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The examiner initially issued thirteen different obviousness rejections, nine of which relied on United States Patent No. 5,287,815 to Gross (“Gross”) as a pri- mary reference.Footnote 4 also related to the AIA: “Unlike an ex parte reexamination pro- ceeding, an inter partes reexamination proceeding allows the third-party requester to participate in the reexamina- tion by submitting written comments addressing issues raised in the patent owner’s response to an… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:26 am by Kevin
Fleming lost part of his left leg in a lawn-mowing accident when he was a boy. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 4:08 am by David J. DePaolo
Giving the employer's counsel unbridled access to ex parte communications with an employee's treating physicians would create numerous potential dangers, as noted in Baker [Baker v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm by Steve Vladeck
Chief Judge Baker’s Concurrence In addition to criticizing the majority for some of the analytical shortcomings I’ve outlined above, Chief Judge Baker’s opinion concurring in part and in the result takes the Article III/Article I question extremely seriously (as the majority should have). [read post]